Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: The other side of the coti

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    NYC, NY
    Posts
    1,496
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    Buying vintage glued combos is the way to go. Even if the coti is bottomed out, you have a good shot at the backing being salm.

  2. #12
    Nemo me impune lacessit RobinK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    897
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcb5150 View Post
    Buying vintage glued combos is the way to go.
    Absolutely. Especially the deep rock variant. Kosher, too.

    Not.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    NYC, NY
    Posts
    1,496
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    I'm talking about if you want good bbw, not a coti in general...

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    NYC, NY
    Posts
    1,496
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    As far as cotis go, new or old doesn't really have any quality impact, new can actually be better in the sense that you can specify what you are looking for vs taking a punt on something costly because it has a box or stamps. But if you want a nice slab of bbw, I maintain my opinion on the old stuff having a better chance for a more interesting specimen.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    NYC, NY
    Posts
    1,496
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    Name:  WP_20151214_10_30_36_Pro.jpg
Views: 300
Size:  12.1 KBFound a pic of the rock I was talking about. This is the best bit of bbw I have.

    This is my next best bit, and weirdly, if you were just to judge it in person going by appearances, it wouldn't be promising. Name:  C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_2_zps772f1d34.jpg
Views: 286
Size:  26.0 KB
    Last edited by kcb5150; 12-14-2015 at 03:16 PM.

  6. #16
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    I too did my own BBW study, several years ago during my Coticule collecting period that was rampant then.

    And I also conclude that, it depends on the stone, like all naturals. Some perform, some don’t. I really don’t use Coticules much anymore, for me there are better alternatives and the only good thing to come out of it for me was the discovery of the “French Stones” Vosegine/ La Loraine, which I still actively collect, and there too they vary wildly in performance.

    There is tons of info, test and techniques on the BBW on this and other fora. Try it, experiment with all the techniques and see if it works for you. Some can bevel set and some can finish.

  7. #17
    Preserver of old grinding methods hatzicho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 1230

    Default

    In the older times blue belgian whetstone was not sold as a sole whetstone. But LaLorraine, the reddish blue stone, which is a separate layer in the coticule quarries, was typically sold. This LaLorraine layer shows significantly better sharpening performance than the normal quality BBW stones.

    Name:  IMG_4227.jpg
Views: 360
Size:  32.0 KB

    The interesting thing is, that old investigations of Grognard (Grognard: Le Roche Salmines A coticule dans la region de Salmchateau) showed only a small amount of garnets (grenats/ spessartine) in Lorraine stones. The garnet size was measured as high as in the Blue whetstone (Phyllade).
    So following garnet concentrations and sizes are typical for the different Belgian whetstones, according to Grognards investigations:

    Coticule: 35-45 % garnets 10-20µm
    BBW: 20-25% garnets 15-30 µm
    LaLorraine: 5% garnets 30µm

    The interesting thing concerning the LaLorraine is following. First - there is a significant amount of quartz in the stone, quartz particles that were visible through a microscope.
    The quartz in coticules normally is seen as a poison. The abrasive performance is done by the garnets. But in the LaLorraine stone the included quartz could be an abrasive too.
    Second is, that the Lorraine stones contain a lot of Ironoxide. Iron oxide in form of red Fe2O3 is a good polishing substance. It is a very fine polisher, you may know the red polishing paste which mainly consist of red ironoxide.
    So these two specialties in the La Lorraine stones may be responsible for the good honing performance of these stones.

    Another interesting issue that Grognard found concerning BBW backed to coticule is, that there is a correlation of the garnet content of BBW to the quality of the accompanying coticule.
    In natural combination coticules, where the quality of the coticule layer was regarded only as medium, the garnet content of the BBW on the backside was as low as 5%.
    On the other hand he found in most of the high quality coticules a garnet amount of up to 25% in BBW side.

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to hatzicho For This Useful Post:

    doorsch (12-14-2015), engine46 (12-22-2015), Euclid440 (12-14-2015), Hirlau (12-14-2015), RobinK (12-15-2015)

  9. #18
    Senior Member blabbermouth Hirlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    13,530
    Thanked: 3530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TristanLudlow View Post
    I love the BBW, the diversity in appearance is very interesting and highly appealing to my eyes.

    I've got around 20 or so and they are mostly different looking, a couple ones are from the same vein, and most of mine are natural combo stones; very nice looking stones, I dig their appearance more than the coticules or anything else for that matter.

    I also got one from ardennes coticule a while ago, it's a very big hone and has been a main workhorse and it took a permanent spot in my honing routine.

    I use mine mostly on slurry to reach maximum keenness, after the coti with slurry and before the coti with just water.
    Works very well, it's become part of my routine and gets me excellent results.
    It's basically this method: http://www.coticule.be/progressive-honing-method.html




    Hirlau, how do you like to use yours? Just water or with slurry?
    I use my purple side( that color seems to match mine after it is wet & slurried) I wouldn't call it blue.
    I use it after the 4K Norton ,,, slurried first,,, then water only,,,, jump to the yellow side to a very light slurry,,,,, then finish the razor with the yellow side, water only,,,,, then strop.
    Steel, TristanLudlow and FAL like this.

  10. #19
    Senior Member decraew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Duffel, Belgium
    Posts
    678
    Thanked: 101

    Default

    I tried it, and it worked, but to be honest, except for the experiment I didn't see the point as it is slower working than the regular coticule side of the hone. I would rather buy a cheap small coticule than a larger BBW to work with. Also, if I remember the study well, one test person did feel the difference in edge obtained.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to decraew For This Useful Post:

    s0litarys0ldier (12-14-2015)

  12. #20
    Tradesman s0litarys0ldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Sault Sainte Marie
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    Well OP you are right. No one raves about honing on a Belgian Blue because they aren't phenomenal. They do work but ever so slowly. I've had a good bb before but on my combo coticule the bb side is slow as hell. I only use it if I feel like it. The coticule is much more effective as a hone. My 2 cents.. and if we're talking Canadian currency.. that's - 25 cents
    Euclid440 likes this.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •