Mathematical analysis of sniping strategy
Here's a cool paper, for those who really enjoy the nitty-gritty of eBay bidding:
CiteSeerX — The effects of proxy bidding and minimum bid increments within eBay auctions
It talks about the effect of sniping as a strategy for winning auctions and why sniping makes sense to do over incremental bidding. Interestingly, there is a bit of an inefficiency in eBay's system introduced by the fact that there are minimum "increments" allowed at different stages of the auction, and these increments mean that it isn't always the best to be the very last sniper to enter a price. Instead, these guys think that the best strategy is to be the FIRST of the snipers who enters a price, because that person gets a slight advantage when other bidders' bids are rejected as not exceeding the minimum increment.
Anyway, I know some people here could care less about this stuff, but for those who enjoy a little dash of theory, this paper is a cool read.
say no to bidding wars!!!
I always bid in the last seconds unless there are many of the object, and little interest.
I just figure the highest price I am willing to pay, set up the bid price, and wait out the seconds. It was much harder to do when they did not show the seconds remaining, I had to use a clock.
When new I entered into one of those "bidding wars", never again!!:beer2: