Differences Between Police Officers & Civilians
Ok, here's an interesting piece of video I came across, and it begs a question- are you ever justified in fighting back against a police officer? Watch the video, and look past all the commentary on profiling or the editorial from the newscasters at the end, as it's all just race baiting or political fluff that can't be proven or disproven anyway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62bF...e_gdata_player
I certainly have tons of respect for police officers, and I know that their job is a very difficult one. However, I know of no other profession where the use of physical aggression, short of a security guard or military personnel, is considered to be a normal part off the job and allowed to be used.
I also know that a use of force is reviewed internally, so there is a check and balance system in place.
The thing is, as is demonstrated in this video, if a civilian were to ever push, even lightly, another civilian they could be arrested, charged and convicted of either assault or battery or both. The only time this would be overlooked would be in self defense. The officer in this video first demands I.D. from the two civilian brothers, which he had no legal basis to do unless he had reasonable, articulable suspicion that they had, were in process of or were going to commit a crime.
Now, the two officers involved in this claim that the brothers made some sort of snide comment in the parking lot, however the last time I checked, our first amendment right guaranteed us the ability to do so. That means that there was no reason for the officers to investigate anything, unless they thought the two brothers were going to commit a crime inside the restaurant.
If they did think so, then after asking the questions they initially did inside, there was no reason to ask for any I.D., period. Our fourth amendment right guarantees that.
At that point, one of the brothers points this out to the officers, and things escalate.
Personally, I can have a heated exchange with a person and not ever, ever put my hands on them. There should be no need to "preemptively gain control of the situation", since regardless my logic and argument should speak for themselves. So, why then did the first officer feel the need to put his hands on the first brother?
Personally, I think that as an officer, if you have no justification for physically being aggressive to me, and I know beyond a doubt that the law is on my side, I will fight back if I deem it necessary (there are usually better solutions than physical aggression, though). The fact that you wear a badge does not mean you can unjustifiabley become physically aggressive with me. If you do, you have broken the law, and I am within my legal rights to defend myself. Again, just my opinion.
So, again, at what point does a civilian become justified in fighting back against an officer? What determines where the civilian ends and the police officer begins?
Differences Between Police Officers & Civilians
O.K.,,,against my better judgment I will comment on this thread.
There is no differences between police officers & civilians, in that police officers come into their job from the civilian segment of life. Police officers are not factory produced with a "certified level of competence" in all arenas of human interaction. Yes, they receive a piece of paper "Diploma" (State Certification) stating that they completed a course of study in selected topics, from a police academy. These State Certifications are highly inadequate & the training varies from state to state. Most officers never see additional training, after the academy, that covers situations like the one that occurred. Police officers go from situation to situation, using the same few tools that they were given to them. Here's a kick in the a$$ for you, more scrutinity is put into the manufacturing of an automobile, before it leaves the assembly line; than the training given to a person who chooses the career of a police officer. A sad thing indeed.
After watching the video, I can say that I would have handled things differently,,,it's easy to be a Monday Morning Quarterback, isn't it? ;)
The one good thing about this video, is that none of the parties could fight worth a da*n, so no one got really physically hurt.
The officers (The City) will get sued, the young men who were detained will get paid, along with their lawyers; the officers will be sent for more inadequate training & are now part of a video that will be used in academys.
Before you pass judgment on police officers in general & think you know what they "can & can't do" ; remember that 95% of them will respond to your call for help. They will arrive with different life skills, some will leave your problem better educated for the next time, some will leave on their backs.