Originally Posted by
gugi
I am not convinced people's primary motivation for amassing wealth is to leave it to their children after they're dead. The ones with such interests are dynasties (family name trumps the individual) and they tend to be not the most productive members of the class.
It seems to me that those who are most productive do the things they do because they find fulfillment in that and that isn't going to change.
I am not sure I understand the issue with corporations. From what I understand the whole idea of them is to have the capital/ownership/decisionmaking be a lot more distributed.
It's a toy model I've thought of, that addresses directly one particular issue. I don't think it's practical and haven't really thought about many details because the chances of it happening are negligible. Plus I'm not an economist or politician or have any formal knowledge of governance, sociology, economics, .. I'm just a hack who tends to find a lot of problems interesting enough to put some thinking into them :)