Good article for those that will read it ........ :chapeau
The real JFK mystery, 50 years later: Why the infamous murder must be reinvestigated - Salon.com
Printable View
Good article for those that will read it ........ :chapeau
The real JFK mystery, 50 years later: Why the infamous murder must be reinvestigated - Salon.com
That was the biggest sham ever,Oswald never shot the pres,he was not even in the building at the time.
What happend on the grassy Knoll? A sharp shooter for sure,why did kennedys head expload to to rear when the shot came from the back?
What happend to the stop sign with a bullit hole?, what happend to the pce of concreat curb that was removed.
Why was his security people all drunked up the night before?
Why was the CIA allowed after oswald was dead to place the purported rifle used in his cold dead hands?
Why was his autopsy shrowded in mystery? (kennedys).
Here we go,,,,,:rofl2: this might even out-post the "What is wrong with America thread." :roflmao
Here are some photos I took in 2007 of the shooting sight. I got to stand next to the open window, top right, the place Oswald took the shots,,,, I believe in one shooter, no conspiracy,,, just my opinion,,,:shrug:
Attachment 185330
Attachment 185332
Attachment 185333
Attachment 185334
Attachment 185335
So John, why did his head explode to the rear and not the frount
It was a big a$$ bullet that Oswald had loaded with the tip down into the casing,,, He was a hell of a shot, but not worth a da#n at reloading,,,:beer2:
Lots of questions but not in Fifty One Years has anyone came forward with the evidence that unequivocally proves a conspiracy.
Well, I believe it is absolutely clear, for those who really look into it, that there was more than one shooter, therefore, a conspiracy. And I am in good company .....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF4_...irXuv84-fmMTNg
"Me or anyone else is absolutely sure "
No,,,,,:rolleyes: I shoot quality war rifles,,,,,,,,,:p
Why does this signal conspiracy
?????
,,,,,,,,even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now & then,,,, ;)
I like this one :)
Mortal Error - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reading many books on both sides of the fence and like the one I linked in the Wiki that straddles the middle, there is certainly compelling evidence both ways..
Ballistically speaking once you drill down to just the shooting and get rid of all the BS that sidetracks the evidence it is possible that Oswald did all the shooting.
You have to find all the Ballistic evidence though, and not fall for things like the "Magic Bullet" trajectory, and get around the first shot "miss", and the inaccurate timing that was mis-represented for so many years.. Even the head shot movement is explainable to a Carcano round..
Over the years I have moved from the conspiracy multiple shooter side, to leaning more toward Oswald did it,, not convinced, but feeling more comfortable with it.. Jack Ruby is one aspect that has always been the one thing that never made sense to me however :shrug:
Would love to know for sure someday :p
One of the best I've read ....... http://www.amazon.com/Not-Your-Lifet...6718792&sr=1-1
The whole thing reeks of conspiracy. JFK left those guys at bay of pigs to die or go to Castro's prisons. The CIA people who lived with them, training them for years, never forgave him. In 1963 if you would have said the that CIA worked with the mafia in a plot to assassinate Castro you would have been considered nuts.
The truth of that came out in the early '80s. A congressional committee investigating the Kennedy and King assassinations came to the conclusion that there was a conspiracy in the JFK event. We'll probably never know, but I think the hit was a group effort between rogue elements of the CIA and the mob who they had worked with in the plot to kill Fidel.
LBJ, RFK, among many others who were in a position to know thought there was a conspiracy. I could go on an on and whatever, most of the naysayers probably didn't read the article I posted in the OP ....... 'cause they already know.
One of the best I've read ....... Not in Your Lifetime: The Defining Book on the J.F.K. Assassination: Anthony Summers: 0001480435481: Amazon.com: Books
You use the same tactic as the people who made the 911 thing. By asking 'why' many times, you make people believe that the X happened because you make them think about 'why'. They skip the part where they ask themselves whether X actually happened.
You can make anything and everything sound like a conspiracy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dvv-Yib1Xg
Oswald may or may not have shot JFK. The story there is dodgy enough that it may have been someone else. But to assume that this is a huge conspiracy that involved dozens or hundreds of participants is a bit much. The lid would have been blown off by now.
Every why I asked is factual,well documented information,Am asking why because those questions might shed some light on what actually happend and why it happened.