Al least as the New Yorker sees them:
http://www.newyorker.com/images/cove...07_21_p323.jpg
Pretty accurate don't you think?
Printable View
Al least as the New Yorker sees them:
http://www.newyorker.com/images/cove...07_21_p323.jpg
Pretty accurate don't you think?
Now the Libs will really back him, hes been victimized! I guess the truth hurts.
That is a parody of how the New Yorker thinks they have already been victimized. Not offering an opinion here just pointing out the mistake.
Satire.
Seeing as how it came from The New Yorker.....I highly suspect it as a liberal ploy to bring in undecideds in favor of the leftist candidate, Obama.
They are! they turn truth on its head and then insist that your the insane one! You have your average Joe just trying to get by. You have all manner of people of different faiths and political leanings who believe in what they say and do! I call these people the honorable opposition, because while we may not see eye to eye, neither do we try to convince each other that the lie is the truth and vice verse! The "liberal" is a different breed all together! The cancer within! The worm that dieth not!! the soul purpose of a liberal seems to be to tear down all that is good! they will stare you right in the eye and tell you that black is white and if you don't see it their way then your the idiot!
I would like to add that in my view, a "liberal" as I describe it, is not that common among the populace, but we are rife with such individuals in our senate and congress!
Lets back off a little from these generalizations . . .
I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said "thou shalt not light a fuse and run without facing a temporary ban"