i did answer you exactly, if the people of north carolina want to change the constitution so be it. it is their decision. that is the dynamic.
Printable View
atheist is not a religion. the document says freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. amend the documents to specify what you want and i have no problem with it....the comparison to gay rights was just an example of the rights of a state to allow or not allow certain things according to the states wishes.
As far as constitutionality goes, I'd bet that the Supremacy Clause and the no religious test clause (both from article VI) trump the NC constitution.
I think it is deeply lamentable that any professed Christian should abandon their so called 'Christian values' (which are really just Humanistic values which people the world over share) in order to embrace discrimination. I sincerely hope you can accept the error of your position 59caddy. Freedom of religion necessarily includes but is not limited to freedom from religion. We're talking about rights, yes?
I don't think anyone would argue that the state does not have the right to allow or not allow certain things.
What is being argued is the fact that this is one of those things that the state does not have the right to allow or not allow. Furthermore the freedom of religion is freedom to believe any religion or no religion at all (as I understand it).
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
It is slightly disappointing that this is a debate.
Again, I wonder, when we will learn?
As a historian I find this reasoning a bit strange. First of all 200 years is not necessarily very long for a state or an empire to exist, as gregs mentioned. There was a discussion about the rise and fall of empires after the Soviet Union fell and political scientists were very surprised about this event as they had regarded the US and USSR as constants in the global arena. A leading political scientist said that they now should all become historians (as historians know that empires are not constants, but rather empires rise and decline).
Secondly, "we have never failed"..what exactly do you mean by that, how do you define failure in this context?
The rise and fall of states does not always, in fact rarely (I actually cannot recall any event), stand and fall over a document but rather has its origins in other factors.
IMO the dogmatic view of the constitution or any other document is problematic in the long run, can you really base society on something written hundreds of years ago in another time and age? This is exactly the problems we find in scripture bound religions as Islam and Christianity. Don't get me wrong there are many good and modern values in the American constitution and the amendments but others are obsolete or will be, values are not universal.
Lastly I believe you are correct that America is in decline, but I really do not understand what you mean by that, is it due to something related to the constitution or a general moral collapse? Please explain.
Wow, this is a really heated topic.:argue::boohoo:::gwh:
First, this is a small election and is not going anywhere. I doub the guy will get elected seeing as an NAACP former chapter president agrees with the NC requirement. Plus North Carolina is going to buckle like Alabama did on the Ten Commandments. I do not think the sate has the Brass of Mississippi that said they would continue prayer in their school despite what the Supreme Court says. I think NC should do what it wants despite the court and if they want to change their requirements, then let them do so. No other state or Federal government has any right to contest that in my mind and the founding fathers certainly would not have intervened. Plus someone said some of the founders were Atheists? Who were they I would like to know?
Second, Lets suppose NC did defy the court, what then? The Supreme Court has no military command, nor do they have the authority to enforce their ruling. Suppose then, the president gets involved, what is he going to do? Impose sanctions? Cut funding? The people of NC might decide not to send their tax money collected to Washington.
Finally, if the federal government looses with threats, what then? Do you think the American people will allow another president to order the slaughter of Americans and burn their homes like Lincoln did? Plus do you think the US military will invade NC or that a US soldier will fire on his own people? I think not.
Let's not kid ourselves, nothing is going to happen other than NC will change their law because the don't have the guts to stand up for it. I am from Georgia and it would be the same way there. The Christians of this country are a dying breed. They won't stick together and are so hypocritical sometimes that they can't stick to their guns. Besides, I would vote for a Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, Jew or anyone who I believed qualified so long as I know they have something for which they believe in as a moral guide. A true Aethiest has no beliefs in anything, and are much are like mercenaries were described by Machiavelli, they will not be steadfast in anything. Without morals, there is no law, so no, you can not believe the law will rule and you can't maintain morals without the belief, otherwise your morals will change to what suits you at the time.
Let's eat, drink:beer2::),and be merry because we are no longer the United States, we are really the United Federal Government of America. It's what is best for all that matters.
Its going to be fine people. Breath, Breath!:matrix::soapbox: