chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
So if there was a contest between a woodchuck and a beaver as to how much wood they could move who would win?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Be specific with your reasoning.
Printable View
chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
So if there was a contest between a woodchuck and a beaver as to how much wood they could move who would win?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Be specific with your reasoning.
They are bigger, have more meat on them, their fur is warm and coveted, indeed the demand for it helped build this nation and if that's not enough, Beaver's build dams. Let's see a chuck try that.
But then I'm biased.
YouTube - We Are The Beaver~The Arrogant Worms
I would have to say the beaver would beat a woodchuck hands (or paws as the case may be) down. Woodchucks do not actually chuck any kind of wood. They are burrowers but have been known to climb trees to escape predators.
But of course there are others who may disagree
WikiAnswers - How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood
I think the Canadians would win.
+1 different critters.
I do recall a woodchuck that crawled and dug his way under
the fence to the garden. He settled down and ate an entire
head of cabbage. The then waddled down the row and ate
half a head of cabbage. His greedy piggy little behind came
to a sad end. He was so fat that he could not drag his belly
back under the fence -- thus caught belly full -- he met his
maker.
The question asks "...IF a woodchuck could chuck wood," which implies that woodchucks can't chuck wood, so the answer would be a beaver if we believe the assumptions of the asker. However, the asker is asking for the outcome of a hypothetical situation in which a woodchuck can chuck wood, in which case there is no reason to limit the woodchucking capabilities of this theoretical woodchucking woodchucker thus the woodchuck would win. Get it? Got it! Good.
Everyone knows that the woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood. However, woodchucks can't chuck wood, so the beaver would win. Having said that, if a woodchuck could chuck wood, it would win because it'd chuck as much wood as it could whereas the beaver would stop once he's fulfilled whatever purpose it had for chucking wood...
I would say a beaver. They're bigger and used to moving wood for their dams.
The real question though, is how many boards would the Mongols hoard, if the Mongol hoards got bored? :D
woodchuck norris.
'nuff said :)
Beaver. I've seen some pretty big trees felled by them critters
and beavers can get quite a bit larger than woodchucks.
Beavers also build their homes out of wood they are master carpenters.
Chucking wood is their profession.
The woodchuck is a misnamed animal in my opinion. :D
Woodchucks are mean animals second only to badgers. They have very bad attitudes. The only determination they have is to bite. They are too lazy to chuck any wood.
The amount of wood that woodchucks would chuck on a given day varies greatly with the individual woodchuck. According to a Wall Street Journal article, New York State wildlife expert Richard Thomas found that a woodchuck could chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. Thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equal to 700 pounds.
Does this answer the question to your satisfaction ?? :)
Well the fly tying world can supply you
with a pelt and you can tie your own knot
and set it into brush handle.
Fly Tying Furs Handles Quality Furs for your Fly Tying needs.
As you read the selection dubbing fir is the
fine fur under the guard hair. Guard hair
is what you want for a brush.
Taxidermy shops may also have interesting
material.
I have dispatched more than one of these
rodents and my impression is that it is
not brush material.
Speaking about brushes. Has anyone
tried a natural paint brush. Perhaps a
largish Stencil Brush or Stipple Brush?
Large Stipple Brush #16