Thanks for the info, Bill. What are the differences in risk in a general sense between an REO property and a property going through the foreclosure process?
I spoke with a realtor relative today to get her opinions. In Minnesota, a home owner must disclose a wide array of info in relation to damage to a home from water damage all the way to whether the home was used to manufacture illegal substances (meth, etc). My understanding is that for a bank owned property, the bank does not disclose any such defects, problems.
In our area of the state which is essentially rural, we actually do have a big problem with meth manufacture and usage. Many old farmsteads, which are remote, relatively speaking are rented out since the owners are either dead or in nursing homes. Such properties are ripe for criminals to manufacture drugs. I've known one person personally that unknowingly bought a "meth home" about six years ago. I believe it was a foreclosure home but I'm not certain. Her and her husband had rapid and mysterious health problems and most of her hair actually fell out. Then they found out it was a meth home. The whole home was knocked down and removed from the site. To this day the only thing left standing is the attached garage. The house looks like it was ripped from the garage and the property is abandoned.
As you've said, Bill, naturally each property is unique with its own risk or lack thereof. I'm just trying to weigh risk in general vs. purchasing a non-foreclosure property.
Chris L