Originally Posted by
mapleleafalumnus
Jack:
No need to whip out fallacious arguments. I've already explained superstition. It is non-contingent behavioural reinforcement. If I do "something" (behaviour) and then a desirable effect results, I've been reinforced (either positively or negatively). This reinforcement increases the probability that, in similar or identical circumstances, I will reproduce the "something" behaviour again in the future. Even if the "something" (behaviour) has absolutely nothing to do with the reinforcement, ex. dancing to get the rain to stop.
I do like that you dared to whip out Chomsky's argument, though! It does work somewhat w/models of vision, if I recall.