I also think they should be banned.
James.
Printable View
I also think they should be banned.
James.
Primarily common sense.
Here's a fairly brief overview of an article reflecting my thinking.
Larry Hirsch: Assault Weapons Ban: It's Common Sense
Keegan,,Please,,,,have an opinion of your own & not one of a staff writer for the Huffington Post of all places. Here is an introduction of Hirsh taken from the Post; "Larry Hirsch has been active for over two decades in New York City politics.
He is the Former President of Community Free Democrats and was the State Committeeman for the 69th Assembly District .
After spending the first 50 years of his life in New York City, Mr. Hirsch and his family have moved to New Jersey, where he expects to get active. "
Give us some personal insight into your position against firearms, please.
uughh. I'm going to go throw up now.
I agree. Those who regularly laugh at facts and unnecessary deaths often defend the right to the tools to cause those deaths. Of course the weapons makers and sellers encourage such misinformation and ignorance.
Interesting that most law enforcement groups support a ban on automatic weapons, though.
I doubt that this is a topic where a consensus can be reached here.
--james
Jeez even the Huff post super user comments think that is a terrible anti gun argument..
There have got to be better articles out there to help voice your opinion, try this link it has a ton of Anti-gun Organization links for you to read and learn how to state your opinion..
http://www.georgiapacking.org/links_antigun.php
I mean if you are going to be anti-gun at least link an intelligently written article :shrug: Hirsch basically writes "Assualt guns are bad, nobody needs them, because they are bad"... Reminds me of Second grade "See Dick run, See Jane run"
Honestly, I just double checked for you jgkeegan your opinion doesn't much matter anyway the government made the decision for you
***In Taiwan, no civilians may lawfully acquire, possess or transfer a firearm or ammunition***
That entire article is based on the flawed premise that the sole purpose of an "assault weapon" is to kill people.
If you buy into that premise, I suppose it does make sense.