http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...n/DSC_0001.jpg
Printable View
MMMMM....makes me want a drink:y
Don,
The only thing I see wrong there is the seal is not broken and there are no cigars around!
Give me a call; I'm willing to travel to help a brother out and I can provide training!
v/r
Allen
That is a Humi it is on, an As soon as I wrap up work it will not be the case .:DQuote:
Originally Posted by RMC_SS_LDO
Well, it is damn cold in Ohio but I would make the trek; just wish I could ride my bike up!
Hell, I will bring some goodies with me if the QED soap is in!
v/r
Allen
Welcome anytime, the humi and bar are always openQuote:
Originally Posted by RMC_SS_LDO
Well you're certainly off to a good start! I'm about to pour a glass of 10 year Macallan, I've never had the pleasure of the 15.
I've only had MaCallan 12... the only single malt I've had, but I can't drink Dewars or Cutty anymore... Just don't taste good... however cheap scotch IS good for putting on some pipe cleaner to swab out the sludge..
One of my favorite things is sitting on the porch with a glass of scotch, and a pipe (cigars are good too... but pipe more often).
Another of the nice drinks is Bacardi 8. Supposudly used to be reserved for the Bacardi family.. bit more expensive than Superior, but cheaper than Mcallan.
Macallans are good whiskies, but, if you like big, heavy flavors, and pairing with cigars, you should try some of the Islay malts. The peat-smoke flavors tend to go well with cigars. Laphroaig 10, Lagavulin 16, and any Ardbeg would all be excellent choices. If you really want to put some hair on your chest, Laphroaig Cask is a beautiful, heavyweight whisky.
I know a lot of people love the heavier whiskies like those you mention but I really don't think they're a good choice for somebody who hasn't tried malts before. Macallan (or something equally smooth) is much better as a starter - I've know people be put off by the more "interesting" whiskies on their first try.Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS
Well, there's something to that, which is why I said,Quote:
Originally Posted by trewornan
It's typical to suggest starting any new epicurean endeavor with lighter examples of the class. But not everyone's palate appreciates the lighter stuff as much as the heavier stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS
When I started smoking cigars, I was advised to try Macanudos; I wasn't too impressed with cigars until I smoked heavier Hondurans, Nicaraguans, and Cubans. When I started drinking malts, I was told to try Glenfiddich and Glenlivet; I didn't really enjoy scotch until I tried Laphroaig some years later. I had similar experiences with beer and wine.
Based on my own experiences, I'm inclined to suggest that men who know their own palates begin where their palates are likely to lead them.
I'll admit to a certain partisanship. Although I enjoy some of the Island malts on occasion, I do prefer the lighter, and most especially, smoother stuff in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS
There's some similarity between straight razors and malt whisky in that it's highly individual and everybody's preference will be different. Do you start of with a 5/8 hollow or a 9/8 wedge? There'll always be the ones who do start with something extreme and love it, but what would you recommend to a beginner?
Ideally - buy a bottle of Macallan AND a bottle of Laphroaig.
Now you're talking. :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by trewornan
OK I am hooked Lynn and Bill say this could be one of the worst AD:eek:
It could be bad. At least with RAD, HAD, SCAD or whatever you don't run the risk of falling off your barstool:roflmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Don
And then there is CAD (cigar acquisition disorder).....
But with all of those, you at least have something other than a headache and $0.50 worth of glass in the morning.
Another round of clays is sounding good and then some single malt, a pyro, a fireplace and rocking chair. We will have to do that again. I have a 3-bird shoot at Indian Ridge on Easter weekend, those are a blast.
Just 1 tip that was given to me by a master: remove all of the seal, and not only the part that allows you to open the bottle.
Drops will crawl into the remainder of the seal, and might fall into our glass the next time you pour.
A lot of seals are still made of lead, and while we are talking only about trace amounts, it is always a good idea to avoid lead ingestion.
Finally it was a warm day for a short walk so here it is. I've decided to get 100 proof 'cause I've read a few reviews and they were better for 100 proof than regular.
Funny story about the 100 proof:
Most standard malt bottlings are blends of different malts of the same distillery. The phrase 'single malt'only means that all the whisky inside is malt from the same distillery.
unless 'single cask' is specified on the label, you can be sure that they mix a number of casks to get a balanced whisky.
The age of the whisky that is reported on the label is that of the youngest whisky in the mix. So a 10 year old might have part 12 or 15 year old in it to bring balance to the taste.
Several years ago, the master blender (the one who is in control of what gets bottled when) at Springbank had a sudden lapse of common sense and for some unknown reason, used 20 - 40 year old malts in the 100 proof bottling.
I was told they fired him for it, and noone know why he did it.
The bottles should be recognizable by the rims of the label, which is red instead of black. I was told by someone who is an insider that it was an incredibly good whisky, and very cheap for what you got :)
Don't get your hopes up on finding such a bottle though.
This happened a long time ago, the number of bottles this happened to is limited, and once people found out what happened, those bottles were quickly bought by those in the know.