I would leave it alone and see how it works. JMO. As Jimmy said, they had a particular finish. I have heard some are more coarse on the back side than the front as they were made. It may be that flattening them would have a negative effect.
I would leave it alone and see how it works. JMO. As Jimmy said, they had a particular finish. I have heard some are more coarse on the back side than the front as they were made. It may be that flattening them would have a negative effect.
Well I went ahead and flatten it using some wet/dry sandpaper and I think it turned out fine. It is not quite as polished as it was but I think it will polish back up after use with lather.
My understanding is that this stone is considered a three line from the time the father was making them is two sided but not sure how the rates would be for each side.
There is no need to lap a barbers hone, just do the recommended number of x strokes and you will be fine. Should you choose to lap it you take the chance of destroying the finish and binder that hold the artificial stone together.
I have a lot of Swatys. I have never been able to discern any difference between their two sides other than the presence or absence of the imprint.
Oh, and I second the notion of not lapping a barber hone. Achieving perfect flatness is not as necessary as an intact honing surface.