Norton 220/1000 vs. pure 1000 (vs. DMT)
Hey guys,
I am looking to get a complete full range of hones, so that I have a bevel setter all the way up to polishing...I currently have Norton 4k/8k, Naniwa 12k, as well as diamond and Chromox paste. I guess that means what is left is to acquire a dedicated bevel setting stone.
First, is there any benefit to getting Norton 220/1000 combo vs. Norton 1000? I suppose a pure 1000 stone has more stone, but does the 220 come in handy enough that it would be worth it, or is the pure 1000 a better choice.
Second, I've read that the DMT 1200 is a good choice for bevel setting, but may cause microchipping initially, whereas the Norton 1000 is a slower cutting stone, but does not create microchipping. What say ye'? DMT or Norton?
If I have the 1k (or equivalent), 4k, 8k, 12k, pastes, is it safe to say that with proper technique and patience, that it would be possible to hone most razors into shave ready condition (including Ebay razors)? And that without the 1k (or equivalent), I would have a much more difficult time with some razors b/c I would have to rely on the 4k as the bevel setter (which technically is possible, but much more time consuming)
Sorry about the length of the post...any help/opinions would be great...thanks, guys!