Printable View
Has anyone heard of this one?
I was cleaning it up and noticed that it was deep into the wood, so I worked on getting it out. Stone is 9 1/4 long x 1 5/8 wide x1 5/8 thick. Stone seems to be a very fine stone & maybe a finisher. It is definitely a natural. What have I got here?
It came from the United Kingdom if that helps...
Attachment 48785
Attachment 48786
Attachment 48787
Attachment 48788
Attachment 48789
Thank you in advance!
There's a hint of Charnley in there. Is that red streaking or am I just hoping? You'd better send it home for further evaluation!
I hate to state the obvious, but what you have is a Douglas Oilstone!
Seriously, that does look like an interesting hone. Perhaps it is a 'brand' of Charnley, although I never knew they were quarried and branded like Eschers...perhaps they were - it does resemble some Charnleys that I have seen.
Or maybe it is a Cutler's Green? They are so elusive **as is the Devonshire Oilstone** that none of us really knows what either looks like, and likely there are variations amongst them as there are with every other natural.
Please test it thoroughly as best you can and let us know the findings of your analysis. This really interests me and I'd love to know how it performs against your Charnley you recently bought.
Thanks for this post.
I have a Charnley Forest and I'm just not sure...but then again it's got that same type of greenish-gray slate look. It just doesn't have the pinks or other colors in it like mine has. I've never had my hands on an escher, but it looks similar to the pics that I have seen...just didn't think folks used oil on them.
Picture 4 is before I cleaned it up & it was oil laden/coated. Picture 5 is after I had cleaned on it some and lapped it till I got tired with 220 on the countertop. It's pretty hard and gives off little slurry. I haven't taken a diamond stone to it yet...
I didn't expect to see a label when I got it out of the wood, that sucker was in there very tight and I believe they use old window sill/caulk, like they used when single pane glass was the only glass, to secure it in the box.
It's not an Escher - Eschers are too soft IMO to be used with oil as it would penetrate too far. And it is not the dimensions of an Escher, even the untypical ones, neither does it look particularly like one IMO either.
It is most likely of UK origin, English, Scotish or Welsh, the latter if it is a variety of slate.
Not all Charnleys have red or pink in them. Some only have the faintest line of it towards one end, and if that one end had been cut differently, it would not even be present. I have a Charnley without any red at all. It is worth lapping it on all sides and looking with a magnifying glass. If you find even the faintest hair thin line of red, it is most definitely a Charnley. If not, it could still be one too.
From these pictures it's hard to tell if it is a Charnley Forest. Perhaps after it has been lapped to about 325-600 grit we can tell. Sizewise it's possible but it could also be a similar stone.
If you have another Charnley Forest you can compare the smoothness of the surface, translucency, smell and sound it makes when you handle it. I wouldn't lap or sand the sides just to look for a red streak.
Nice catch!
I have CFs without red streaks and few weeks back I had one in my hands with simillar shape. What is the size? (Sorry dolar note is not that actual for me in UK).
"C & C" and "Go-Ahead" were trademarks of Colquhoun & Cadman, based at the Douglas Works in Arundel Street, Sheffield, as listed in a 1901 Trades Directory. The firm dates back to 1892. The two founders were Edward Dewing Colqhoun and Edwin Cadman. The firm was Incorporated in 1907. They were a subsidiary of Joseph Elliot & Sons. By 1929 they had moved to Sylvester Gardens in Sheffield.
They produced cutlery, edged tools, and so on. I have seen other stones like that that used by similar trades that turned out to be tams when cleaned up. Yours certainly looks speckled.
Regards,
Neil
Hmmmm...... it does not look like the speckled Tam that I have.... but maybe a Water of Ayr? or......?
Lap it down, immediately!Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Miller
Neil,
That is some great information, THANK YOU! Now to just figure out what it is...I'll get back on task and finish up lapping it...
It's in the OP: Stone is 9 1/4 long x 1 5/8 wide x1 5/8 thick.Quote:
Originally Posted by adrspach
That is relatively normal size for CF. Does the sides have sawing marks, grinding marks or nothing? The reason why I am asking is that lately I saw few hones eith grinding marks simmilar to DT when it comes from the workshop and as CF did not use to be cut in past (more like hacked and flattened with sand). This could help me to get answer about the time the hone was made.
All sides are smooth, straight, and square, except for the ends. They are cut like / \ if you are looking down at the top.
Thank you. Very interesting. I am looking forward to see it lapped and tested.
As soon as the Helmsman poly dries on what is left of the label I'll finish lapping it down.
It's lapped! Well, only the top and I really cleaned up the side. If you will notice there are brown specks and different stuff going on that I haven't seen before. Now maybe you guys can help me out a little more:
Wet:
Attachment 48900
Mostly dry:
Attachment 48901
Side:
Attachment 48902
Looks to me like a Tam O Shanter, especially the last picture. A bit like this one: http://straightrazorpalace.com/hones...tml#post446305 just not as heavily spotted.
Thank you soooo much :beer2:, mine looks exactly like FatboySlim's & his is labeled! :bowQuote:
Originally Posted by Piet
You're welcome, that thread helped me recognize mine as well.
It looks alot like the stone I just found in the Mystery hone thread.
Yes - definitely a tam and a nice one, too! The square section is often a giveaway, like this one from the old Carron Ironworks in Stirlingshire:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...IMG_2852-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...7/IMG_2853.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...7/IMG_2860.jpg
Some of the old texts recommend that this type of stone to be kept submerged at all times while not in use - it is supposed to keep it softer. Can't say I have ever tried it, though!
Regards,
Neil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Miller
Oil or water?
A thin oil gives (arguably) the finest finish, but water with a little dish-soap in it is a good alternative.
Regards,
Neil
