Results 11 to 20 of 132
Thread: How to use Coticule.
-
11-12-2010, 03:03 AM #11
-
11-12-2010, 03:15 AM #12
Wouldn't it depend on what you've previously done to the razor? If you want to set a bevel, or even move from a freshly set bevel to shave ready, I cannot imagine how no slurry would be any faster.
Also, you don't have to keep honing until the slurry dilutes itself; I add water into my slurry periodically to dilute it at the rate I want.
For the average coticule user, I doubt that wearing through the coticule is a concern.
I also don't think that, just because vintage coticules seem to have all come without slurry stones, using slurry is "wrong." It's just a different way to use the stone.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to holli4pirating For This Useful Post:
richmondesi (11-12-2010)
-
11-12-2010, 03:20 AM #13
On the water, in noticed a faint grey tinge come into the water after the first set of 20 half strokes, and slowly build to a certain density over the next couple of sets, but it always stayed quite clear. It's hard to say though, as I kept clearing the hone with water.
Let me lug out the camera and another razor and I'll take a few photos.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
BRB
-
The Following User Says Thank You to wdwrx For This Useful Post:
tat2Ralfy (11-12-2010)
-
11-12-2010, 03:27 AM #14
we are not talking about setting bevel.
if you check op i mention with slurry stone will cut faster.
Any single coticule will make slurry after maximum of 30 strokes.
We are talking about end result.
It's hard to say though, as I kept clearing the hone with water.
-
11-12-2010, 03:34 AM #15
Well, in that case, I haven't seen anyone talking about using slurry on a coti after coming off something like an 8k, so I'm not sure what problem your first post is addressing. I was under the impression that the guys using slurry are setting bevels or going from a 1k to shave ready.
Also, not all coticules will make slurry on their own with 30 strokes, or even 50 or 100. I keep one hard, fine one to use as a finisher, and it does not produce any slurry on its own.
-
11-12-2010, 03:54 AM #16
-
11-12-2010, 04:06 AM #17
Sorry, my photos aren't turning out very good.
I will try to asnwer your original question, which as a learning experience I thought I'd try.
No, i personaly have not read of it in historical context. Isn't that trying to prove a negative though? I believe that the use of slurries isn'yt unheard of nor do I find it unlikely that it could have been used. I'll galdy concede the point though.
Yes, at least that has been my experience. Both in the past, and tonight with my honest effort to give your suggestion a shot.
? typo?
It's a tool. I use 'em all the time. They all wear out. In spite of the the coming price hikes, I'm fully prepared to buy another stone. If it was a $500.00 escher, I'd still use the bloody thing.
This is exactly the opposite of what i found.
I tried quick again to get a slurry build-up on the stone, it took well over 5 sets of 20 half strokes, (100) to build up enough to be plainly visible. Under the lighting conditons i have and my poor photographic skills, my photo look like nothing. And yet another hundred as i type this still hasn't brought the edge back to SAH though there is some grey showing now.
The thought occurs to me that I may not be using the term slurry apropriatley. i make a distinction between swarf and slurry. Swarf is what I consider waste steel in the water, which is what I would call the result after 200 strokes on my stone with water.
I think of slurry as a mixture of water and an abrasive medium. I wasn't getting any abrasive material with water alone, so i'd be more correct to say that I see a build up of swarf.Last edited by wdwrx; 11-12-2010 at 04:13 AM. Reason: left out a sentence
-
-
11-12-2010, 04:16 AM #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 284
Thanked: 74I am not sure about the history of the usage of slurry stones.
Here is a video of Liam Finnegan of the Waldorf Barbershop using a slurry stone. I am not 100% sure, but I doubt he has read about Bart Torf's honing methods.
YouTube - Razor Sharpening
I am confused about the OP's original post. Are you suggesting the proper way to use a coticule is as a finisher only? Or are you saying that a proper coticule will auto-slurry with just water and razor strokes?
As far as Bart's methods go, I was under the impression that the progressive dilution of slurry replaces the multiple grit hones in a progressive honing regimen.
Thanks for any help and comments.Last edited by altshaver; 11-12-2010 at 04:18 AM. Reason: Typo
11-12-2010, 04:17 AM
#19
Yes, I am sure that my coticule will not release any slurry after 30, 50, or 100 strokes on it. If I want a slurry, I use a slurry stone.
I'm sure that all coticules could set the bevel and finish the edge, but it would take varying amounts of time. Just like you could set a bevel with a (choose any finishing stone), if you are willing to do thousands of strokes.
Yes, I do think one stone honing has problems. In my opinion, it's a waste of time and highly inconsistent.
11-12-2010, 04:23 AM
#20
I also thought you meant starting with bevel-setting. I'd like to try this, but I don't understand yet.
If you don't mind, would you please say it again real plainly for us slow folks?
Like:
For taking blade at (some level) and producing result of (some level),
it's better (or faster?) to use (some method).
etc.
Thanks!