Grit issues, does any one else see a problem here

I have been looking at a knife edge for about an hour getting frustrated and scratching my head. Tell me what you see when it comes to the scratch pattern. Note please forgive the poor pics. It's hard to take a pic through a eyepiece and hold a light at the same time. These are done at 100x. The grits are 8k and 16k.

16k
Attachment 189911Attachment 189912

8k
Attachment 189913Attachment 189914

Again in sorry for the poor pics. Tell me if you see a problem. The pics are not switched and the 16k was freshly flattened with a DMT325 and rinsed/cleaned off the best I could.

Forgot to mention both of these are Shapton GS

I assume your concern is that the 16k scratches are more dense than the 8k scratches. I guess without more photos and information, I'm not concerned.

Then again, they are not my hones or blades!

The greatest concern is the depth of the scratches and the 16k scratches SEEM deeper but it is hard to tell.

Yes I am concerned by the density of the scratches. Mainly that my edge is getting less polished on the 16k. I was thinking that if this is doing this on my knife what is it doing to my razor.

Well analysis of data is better than speculation. How about repeating this with a couple of razors?

How many strokes did you do on each hone?

In general you should not do many strokes on a 16k with a razor.

To get a better idea of what is going on, you may also want to change your honing direction between the 8k and the 16k, so that you can better see when the 8k scratches are gone. Make a crisscross pattern and stop when you can't see the 8k scratches anymore.
You will see more scratches per inch with a 16k than with an 8k because there is more grit per inch in the 16k than the 8k.
The 16k scratches should be narrower than the 8k scratches due to a smaller grit.
The 16k scratches should be shallower than the 8k scratches as well, but it is hard to judge the depth of cut in a picture.

Yeah it's hard to judge under the microscope too on the depth. Normally I don't look under my work microscope because the lighting is really hard to manage so I usually use a 45x lighted loupe. Under the loupe as I progress up the grits I always see a finer scratch patter with each grit level and almost a mirror reflection under the loupe at 8k until I get to the 16k. then the edge looks "scratchier" and less mirror like than the 8k. An so is my fear that my 16k is polishing less than the 8k. Because of this I decided to get the higher powered microscope out in hope to see what is going on.

And what's the difference between what the edges can do? I'm not one to look at pictures of scratch patterns, because that's not where the rubber meets the road. Having said that, that's probably why I can't really pull much meaningful information from pictures of scratch patterns...

The pics do not seem to be of the same area ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by onimaru55

The pics do not seem to be of the same area ?

---

You are correct. I honed the entire edge to 16k then for half of the blade I went back in grit to the 8k so that I would have two samples of the same edge side by side to examine and compare.

Oh and before it's mentioned I examined the edge at 8k before moving to the 16k and the 8k was comparable to the above 8k. I just don't have any pics because I didn't think to snap a pic before I moved up to the 16k to see what it was doing.