Originally Posted by
blockhead
I understand the principle behind how the bevel is created. I get that the thickness of the spine, relative to the width of the blade is what determines the size and width of the cutting edge. I am just having a bit of a block as to how a razor with progressively more spine wear toward the toe can have a variance in bevel width, as in on the back side of the blade the bevel is wider toward the heel and on the front the bevel is wider closer to the toe. On the back, the corresponding spine section of the widest beveled area (right at the stabilizer) has almost NO wear.
So, the option you were referencing in the earlier post didn't change the thickness of the spine, just the contour? If that is the case, how do you keep from having this recurring problem? Or would resetting the bevel potentially solve the problem? I know it is hard to comment on a specific razor without seeing the exact situation. As the design of the blade DOES give you a built in honing "guide" with the spine resting on the stone during sharpening, most problems found on these razors would be due to faulty honing, correct? I assume that if you can catch them before too much damage is done, a bevel reset can sort of give you a clean slate?
What if you had a 5/8 and wanted to try a smaller razor, say a 3/16. What problems, geometrically, would you encounter by reducing the width of a blade?