Sorry, but Iīm not all the time online, when I realised my post was closed, and around it grow up this lots of comments, Iīll be impressed, It was not my intencion to make to any controverse. But I Think I must post my opinion, to close finaly it, donīt you think it?. First of all, I can not find any malicious coments, only opinios, quite healthfull all of them. The metod used to restaured a razor is diferent in each situation, this was a quite maltreathed razor, luckly the blade is more or less in good condition, and for mi it was the most important, Im sure that this blade dated arond 1750, by the rest of objects with it recovered, If you work with atiques you know if a place is intact or no. My interest around it is the study about the subtailed blades, no tailed blades, and his marks. The rest is completly personall, Iīm a bit archaeologist, first because Iīm really archaeologist, unemployed, but archaeologist nevertheless. I use 4 razors for my personal shave, but I habe aroun 400, obbiusly, all of them are not in condition to shave anybody, unless he want to cut his veins, and in one ore two is provably heīll dead firs by tetanus...jejejeje....In the presen case I wanted to conserve the razor like I found it, I rescuted it from a metal box found in a wall, wth another things, no rich house, sure.....But the nail for me was not correct to protect the wood of the second scales, the oxidation will make the break bigger and bigger, and I decide sustitute it for a normal pin, but I sure in the past here are not any pins....well is no important. I only used carpentersīs glue, another pin and used washers and a bit portion of cianoacrlate resine to cober the hole, no more, them wax and for me is enaugth to study it. The mark in the blade is important really. I think we donīt know a lot about razors before 1770, I habe one ore two countryside blacksmith made, and without marks. Made in quite little places, like Pirineos. Well, for me I can not find any important subjet to be angry at all. no body must be worried for his opinions, and I think, but is only my opinion and the google traslator opinion, no post must be closed, but is only my opinion, thank to all your advices, and, we will be happy to could share our little knowledge. To end, Wath abouth the marks now you knoy a aproximate date around 1750?...jejejeje, regard to all and thanksAttachment 201279
