Search:

Type: Posts; User: Tathra11; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Sticky: I also bought the new formulation of No.88. It...

    I also bought the new formulation of No.88. It was complete utter garbage. It would not form a lather at all. I used it as shower soap.
  2. Sticky: It really gives me the sh*ts when companies (of...

    It really gives me the sh*ts when companies (of any industry) know that the product they've developed is rubbish, yet still they send the product to market. :cen
  3. Sticky: There is no excuse for marketing an inferior...

    There is no excuse for marketing an inferior shaving soap these days.[/QUOTE]

    So true.

    If C&S performed basic product review/ testing, which I'm sure they did, they knew very well they were...
  4. Sticky: Thanks for this info Steve.

    Thanks for this info Steve.
  5. Sticky: Shame about this soap Joseph. Does the packaging...

    Shame about this soap Joseph. Does the packaging state where or what company now makes the soap? The soap was good stuff when Valobra made it.
  6. Sticky: I've been using Saponificio Varesino soaps for a...

    I've been using Saponificio Varesino soaps for a few years now. I reckon 95% of my shaves are with S.V. soaps. I have all of them except Tundra Artica and Desert Vetiver. Felce Aromatica is...
  7. Sticky: I have both 88 and Oxford & Cambridge. When I...

    I have both 88 and Oxford & Cambridge. When I first used them they both had bugger all scent. After using them for a week or so each, they still had bugger all scent. However, scent aside, I find...
Results 1 to 7 of 7