Originally Posted by
miha
..this might be totally wrong and it is just a wild idea... so as far as I know
- horn is ceratine, and hair is ... (mainly)
- in the 60-70s women used to do their curles (I am sorry but can not remember the expression, I think it's perm)... it was done (if I remember right from my biochemistry lectured :D) that the hair were made in the manner that the hair were wind around the (thingy" and than thiese disulphide bonds (connecting 2 neighbouring ceratine filaments) were broken (reduced), and later again formed with the small difference,.. they were formed between different sulphides (due to neighbouring filaments "sliding" along each other because of winding them ) ..
..so to sum / project my idea on this prioblem :D ... a heat and REDUCING agent (might be the same thing than women used or stronger reducents,.. ps. reducents are toxic as well but are like the ones for the hair less concetrated and/or "potent"), , tahn pressure (eg straightening) and at the end reformation of S-S bonds (disuphide bridges) .. might facilitate the forced form of the horn (plates)
ps. again, this is just an idea that might be a miss :)
pps. a fisrst thing that woudl be good to know should be if the S-S bonds are also as important or aboundant as in a haid fibres...