Originally Posted by
Bart
In my humble opinion:
The shave test is about proofing.
The other tests are about probing.
Big difference.
But still, they all can be valuable, if you learn how to do them and how to read them.
For shave proofing, you got to know how to shave. (beard and skin type are variables)
For the TPT you got to learn how it feels. (skin type and roughness are variables)
For the HHT you got to learn how to read it. (hair type and oiliness are variables)
If you get in front of an audience and do the HHT, then it's a parlour trick.
Showing of how you dare touching a blade with little slicing motions during the TPT is a parlour trick.
If you incorporate a well-calibrated version of the HHT or of the TPT into your sharpening practice, then it's a honing aid.
I encourage any beginning honer to give them all a fair shot and see what works best for him.
In the end, the shaving proof is all that matters, but it would be hard for me to get there without intermediate tests. For instance, I use a sort of HHT along the edge to find out if my bevel is good, coming off a DMT1200. I can't imagine shaving with the razor at that point, and I'm not even sure it would tell me what I need to know at that point. When I, next, progress to a Belgian Blue I use the TPT to assess when sharpness maxes out on that hone. Again, I can't imagine shaving patches of my face instead of performing TPTs.
I wish people would stop dismissing tests as unreliable, just because they didn't work out for them, or because they didn't personally find use for them.
They're just tests, no need to be anal retentive about them. (:thinking:taking as much to myself as to the guys dismissing them;))
Bart.