Results 1 to 10 of 19
Thread: The Return of Ronald Reagan?
Hybrid View
-
12-15-2014, 12:17 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Mid State
- Posts
- 60
Thanked: 3The Return of Ronald Reagan?
Now I am not a politician, and I don't really like politics. But as I see some questionable figures arise for the leadership of our country, I cant help but feel somewhat concerned.
So I thought of something. A unique republican ticket that might result in the return of senses and status in the world for the USA. There has been something missing from politics recently. Too much new stuff...to much rapid change. Now moving forward is never a bad thing...but moving forward too fast is a recipe for disaster.
And this isn't a knock on President Obama. Although I disagree with him on many issues I respect him at the end of the day because he is a politician doing what politicians do. But there is some despising along with the respect, for the same reason. That being that he is a politician, and he has been used of his party to further agendas that I feel he himself doesn't personally endorse.
And that is where you must make a stand as President. If deep down you don't agree with something.....then make a stand. Now, of course, all Presidents have towed the party line, but when it comes to the highest critical and moral issues the party line should become meaningless.
Thus failure to make a stand on one or two issues makes one appear to be nothing more than a puppet, figuratively and.....literally!
Thus all the talk of change, and all of the hope that a President having a different ethnicity was supposed to bring....,,is revealed as bogus! Therefore all of those of the same ethnicity, as well as the new younger voting generation, are slowly beginning to see themselves as fooled. And fooled because the same hand must be controlling things, and the President might really not be calling any shots.
But, really, hasn't that always been the case?
So since it always was the case I figure going back to what actually works, with a few better twists of change might make the difference. Of course I do not speak for these men, but my dream 2016 ticket consists of these two men.
PETER UEBERROTH & BOBBY JINDAL
This republican ticket would work wonders. First off Peter Ueberroth has experience on the world stage from back in the 1984 Olympics. He showed mastery of budgeting and making the impossible happen. His feats with the L.A. Olympics were every bit as wondorous as any task that could be asked of a President. Plus he would bring to Jindal the "feel" and "spirit" of the 1980's.
Peter Ueberroth would be my choice for President and Bobby Jindal for Vice President.
But this is a strategic selection. Ueberroth could opt to groom Jindal for 4 years and step out of the way for the 2020 Presidency...for which Jindal should win and secure 8 years for the Republicans. Keep in mind that Ueberroth performed best in the 4 year Olympic cycle. But what he could do in those 4 year could get us back on track. This would be his specialty and purpose at his advanced age...but it is a great strategy, and one never before considered.
Then with Jindal as Vice and then President in 2020 would do well for foreign policy matters as well as the world stage. Jindal is of India descent, but he is thoroughly American. Thus he would be a standard on the world stage of just how great a assimilated American can be. And he definitely would be a trustworthy President.....unlike those that, for whatever reason, parties agendas appear to be hell bent on weakening this country.
Now of course this is highly unlikely to happen. But if those two men got together it just might work. The campaign logo would even be cool.
Ueberroth - Jindal 2016
"Wouldn't that be great"
Then is 2020 with a Paul Ryan being a little more seasoned, I can see him as a running mate for Jindal
JINDAL-RYAN 2020
"Perfect Sight!"Last edited by Mach7; 12-15-2014 at 12:24 AM.
-
12-15-2014, 02:32 AM #2
I dunno, Mach. I actually might be inclined to agree with you....Or not.
Point is, Politics seem to cause issues as we have guys here from many walks of life and from all over the world.
We gravitate to this forum (I hope!) to talk of straight-shaving and this subforum is for the occasional discussion of other subjects. Religion, Race, Politics sometimes cause issues. Something to think about!
Regards,
Tom"Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
I rest my case.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to sharptonn For This Useful Post:
Wolfpack34 (12-16-2014)
-
12-15-2014, 02:48 AM #3
Every politician who takes contributions from anyone is someone who shouldn't be in office. They should work for the people not their contributors.
-
12-15-2014, 03:21 AM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Across the street from Mickey Mouse in Calif.
- Posts
- 5,320
Thanked: 1185All Presidents puppets ? Yeah, since Kennedy. Ross Perot was talking mass amounts of sense back in the day and when it actually looked like his own money and common sense was going to get him in the lead,,,,, he stopped. Does anyone remember why ? He made the statement right on live TV and that was the only time you could have heard it. In more graceful and extended version he said the lives of members of his family were being threatened. He scoffed at threats against him but could not ignore and would not put his family through that kind of ordeal.
Politics is a horse and pony show you watch and believe is real. If you do believe it's real your not paying attention to the details. No, I do not mean Alex Jones and the like. I mean look and think for yourself. It's not a hopeless situation but it is going to take a disaster to change anything. Only then will people have 1 common cause to rally around. Only then will people look at each other with understanding and compassion. If you take sides you are part of the problem. Sorry, that's just my view of what the basic problem is. The world does not discuss and respect each other like we do in this forum. The countries moderators are only concerned about their own personal wealth and views of how things should be. If you back them you are them :<0)Good judgment comes from experience, and experience....well that comes from poor judgment.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to 10Pups For This Useful Post:
Mach7 (12-15-2014)
-
12-15-2014, 03:32 AM #5
HAR!
"Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
I rest my case.
-
12-15-2014, 04:02 AM #6
All political offices should be once and done, with a lifetime ban on lobbying. Do your job the best you can full time because there won't be a reelection and then go back and live under what you wrought!
The easy road is rarely rewarding.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Splashone For This Useful Post:
Mach7 (12-15-2014)
-
12-15-2014, 12:48 PM #7
That. Folks forget Reagan was equal-left of Obama in his day as president of the Screen Actors Guild. Big-money made him a better offer (General Electric, big ag and oil) of the Governor's Mansion and, subsequently, the White House. Ron was not without charm but he was not without obligations to do a lot of looking the other way, either. Reagan served up Dole and, indirectly, Gingrich, both of whom, for better of worse, presided over the end of a fuctional bicameral democracy in the US. Jindal is a dust bunny. The right needs gravitas. I'm sure Newt will be remarried, reinvented, reconsecrated and ready to re-save the world by 2016.
"We'll talk, if you like. I'll tell you right out, I am a man who likes talking to a man who likes to talk."
-
12-15-2014, 01:01 PM #8
His PR people should issue a better photo - on first look I thought Jindal was a slightly more mature guy from MAD magazine.
Last edited by UKRob; 12-15-2014 at 01:05 PM.
My service is good, fast and cheap. Select any two and discount the third.
-
12-15-2014, 10:01 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Mid State
- Posts
- 60
Thanked: 3It's not a beauty contest. But I have noticed in some of his photos he actually resembles JFK. And that is not a good thing PR wise. All it would take is a whack job possessed of the devil and a gun, to try to reenact Dallas.
So my recommendation if he were to run for President, as a PR guy, I would strongly urge him to grow a nice beard......if he actually can grow facial hair. This would signify the raw masculinity and strength that GOD intended for grown men.
And I say this as a born again Christian, and one frustrated by the radical terrorists reviling us for lack of masculinity.
And, speaking of infidelity, I would also make damn sure Jindal was a faithful husband. If not I would quickly remove him from my consideration.
This is why men are able to grow beards, while women....usually.....can not. And although I definitely like to shave, I do make it a point to grow and keep a nice beard. The politicians always want to be clean shaven....and I mean all of the time.
To me this reeks of weakness, and effeminate ness. The spirit value of a President with a full beard is more powerful than one would imagine. I mean when was the last time a President had a really good beard?
Grant?
And you know Grant was a great General. So power, masculinity and beards go hand in hand with RESPECT! And just a a spider has instinct to make a web, so will the watching world...on GOD given instinct alone, show more respect toward a well bearded American President.
Just my thoughts, but it would be a good trend. Still nothing feels as good as shaving a good beard, so as to regrow it again. But the point is that there must be a balance when it comes to the appearance of the US President....and for far too long we have been out of balance with shaven men refusing to wear a beard.Last edited by Mach7; 12-15-2014 at 10:08 PM.