Originally Posted by
gugi
No point of quibbling over a tongue-in-cheek remark, especially when it begins to distract from what really matters. The point is that his job record speaks for itself:
June 20, 1775 – September 26, 1776: Delegate to the Second Continental Congress from Virginia
June 1, 1779 – June 3, 1781: Governor of Virginia
November 3, 1783 – May 7, 1784: Delegate to the Congress of the Confederation from Virginia
May 17, 1785 – September 26, 1789: United States Minister to France
March 22, 1790 – December 31, 1793: United States Secretary of State
March 4, 1797 – March 4, 1801: Vice President of the United States
March 4, 1801 – March 4, 1809: President of the United States
I think he took those positions as reluctantly as Paul Ryan the speakership of the House, or Donald Trump the republican nomination - primarily for the good of the country :)
But history tends to judge politicians by their accomplishments, not by their motivations. Which means that we'll have to wait and see what president Trump or president Clinton will accomplish. Just like the Louisiana purchase ended up in the history books as a 'tremendous deal', to use the parlance of our time, despite being deemed anti-constitutional and executive power grab at the time.