Results 11 to 20 of 23
Thread: Prolly????
-
01-27-2008, 04:28 AM #11
Actually, we don't have an official language (though we ought to). But I do agree, nuclear oughta be easy to say.
-
01-27-2008, 06:38 AM #12
-
01-27-2008, 10:15 AM #13
The one that really irks me is 'pacific' for 'specific'. It makes me want to bludgeon them with a big book of grammar when someone says "I pacifically wanted the red one".
-
01-27-2008, 12:06 PM #14
Come on you're on a mac it's f12 away
So, here it is spelled out:
Democrat = noun
Democratic = adjective
Republican = noun, adjective
When you call a person Democrat it's correct and fine. When you say the 'Democrat party', instead of 'Democratic party' it is wrong, and the only reason it is used in the US politics of late is because of the ending on 'rat'.
I'm surprised US doesn't have an official language, but may be that's true. How do students in school get graded then? Based on "Webster's" dictionary? Or is it at the full discretion of the teacher?
After all if you can imagine only one way to spell a word, you're clearly lacking an imagination.
In my country there's an institute at the national academy of sciences that decides what is correct and what isn't. They publish a dictionary, and even though nowadays everybody can publish whatever they want, that dictionary determines what is correct and what is not. There are rules where you put the commas, etc.. I used to have a book on correct (american) english grammar. It was written by a professor at one of the Ivy league schools, although he's long dead and I imagine that there's more development. Hmm, speaking of which, wasn't there a book 'Eats, shoots & leaves'? Anybody read it? Where did she get the rules from, has to be a preface or something?
-
01-27-2008, 02:43 PM #15
prolly is a shortened form of probably. for whatever reason, the word probably is more difficult to type on a qwerty keyboard than other words of a similar length, most likely due to letter placement.
because of this, as typing culture became more evolved, this became an accepted contraction, akin to cannot->can't, etc. Many people don't actually say "probably" they say "probly" and from there the progression is easy to see.
I am a software engineer, and I see this word all the time in official documents that programmers have created. I am also inclined to use it myself, most of the time I don't really notice it. It should be noted that many people in my trade actually speak typing contractions from time to time, although the majority of these takes the form of TLAs. Sorry for any confusionLast edited by jockeys; 01-27-2008 at 02:52 PM.
-
01-27-2008, 02:51 PM #16
Think we could make any money opening a diction academy?
prolly nt imho
-
01-27-2008, 04:00 PM #17
-
01-27-2008, 04:06 PM #18
-
01-27-2008, 04:43 PM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795
-
01-27-2008, 06:12 PM #20
I think strop would do. At least it has proven track record as 'attitude adjustment' device, as seen here
I'm not sure why insisting on using english for official purposes is racist though. Unless there isn't really a formal official language in US. It's a federation though, so if there were never rules on what language the federal documents ought to be, it makes sense that once there is a large minority among the citizens that has different language it's got to be taken into account. As far as I know virtually all countries including federations have official language(s) that's written in laws.
But it seems that people here prefer as minimal federal regulations possible.
Here's the government data on US population:
Languages: English 82.1%, Spanish 10.7%, other Indo-European 3.8%, Asian and Pacific island 2.7%, other 0.7% (2000 census)
note: Hawaiian is an official language in the state of Hawaii