An interesting little twist!
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03...r-photo-smear/
Printable View
An interesting little twist!
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03...r-photo-smear/
Oh man, foxnews must be scraping the bottom of the barrel. There are so many much more important things happening in the world today....
Plus the reporting is the worse I've ever seen. Where's all the important information - how many goats are we talking here? I'm sure many would gladly wear a turban in exchange for some goats.
Well, they're only considering a fine of cattle but say an apology will do!Quote:
Originally Posted by gugi
As far more important things today, I would rather watch this cat fight, also known as the primaries for the DNC candidate!
Can I then perhaps apologize to you (really profusely if necessary) in exchange for the smallest of baby goats?
The spiritual MENTOR of the man who wants to be our next president!
Anyone remember that John Kennedy was abhorred by many in this nation for being Catholic? And that accusations ran wild about how "the Pope would rule America" if he were elected. Good thing we learn from our own history, right?
Boy I'm glad I'm not a rich white man ---- I don't think I could muster up the energy to hold down a whole race ------- well Obama should at least be called to answer for attending a church where the preacher is a total idiot ---- I mean the whole birds of a feather thing. I generally don't think people should be judged for those that endorse them, but attending a church on a regular basis that is headed by such a person is significant --- he must like and agree with what this guy says (I'm assuming which is the problem)Quote:
Originally Posted by JMS
Justin
+1 That's bang on Russel!Quote:
Originally Posted by Russel Baldridge
Thanks, I just think its ridiculous how much stock the American public puts in the aspects of candidates lives that have nothing to do with how they'll run the country. I say cut out all the crap that doesn't deal with relevant political issues and hold weekly debates, round table discussions, anything that gives you a true feel for the person's character as it applies to the issues they'll be facing. All this talk of personal lives, religious beliefs and skin color is little more than sophomoric gossip that distracts good people from assessing what's really important.
So where do you draw the line? Are we voting for a leader of a nation or just some robot who manages things without addressing his personal inclinations and beliefs? I don't know where to draw the line on this one. If I see that a presidential candidate has a poster of Karl Marx, or some Communist revolutionary on his office wall -- I might think a little ----If I see a presidential candidate attend white supremacist organizations or has Hitler posters on his wall, I might think a little ------- Is it the total package or do you think a person can be a president without being affected by his religious beliefs, personal life, etc ------ where do you draw the line.Quote:
Originally Posted by Russel Baldridge
Justin