Originally Posted by
billyjeff2
Well, it still is appropriate to note that he's (evidently) being booted out of office without having been convicted of anything. Although the evidence laid out by the prosecutor's office appears to be compelling, Blago does raise a valid point in terms of his limited opportunity to interpose a defense at his impeachment trial. It would certainly be interesting if he's convicted at the impeachment trial and then subsequently acquitted at the criminal trial. I'm cognizant of the fact there's a different legal standard that applies to both, but we are talking about removing a duly elected official from office...