Really ? If that is the case then Professor Bart Ehrman's body of work is in serious error. Since he studied the available texts in their original languages for the past forty years, first as a student and later as a college professor, I wonder how he could have come to such an erroneous conclusion ? Among the dozen books he has written on the New Testemant ,his best seller
Misquoting Jesus: Who Changed The Bible and Why, is over 200 pages on that topic.
To say that believing modern bible scholarship is a 'leap of faith' equivalent to faith that the gospels are accurate doesn't hold water in my view. Assuming Ehrman's work is correct it is a matter of fact. Perhaps that is why he started out as a fundamentalist Christian and is an agnostic today. When he graduated from Moody Bible College they warned him not to go on to Princeton. I guess he should have listened to them.