Results 1 to 10 of 154
Threaded View
-
03-25-2010, 08:07 PM #10
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 43
Thanked: 6There are those that would prefer to not live in, what you've been referring to as, 'civilized society'.(From reading what you've written I take your meaning of civilized society as; one in which physiological & safety needs have been met. If I have misinterpreted what you said I apologize.) Who may only want VERY minimal interference in their lives, and don't need, again your words, anyone monitoring/providing for their "survival needs". Their happiness comes from providing from themselves.
I cite Libertarians, while they may not be exactly as described above. As I understand it, they seek maximal freedom and very little if any government.
My point being, there two sides to every coin and plenty of middle ground; and the supposition "WE" probably isn't accurate vis-a-vis humanities view on any given topic. There are so many view points about what freedom is, I would think there is always going to be someone who feels their freedom is being infringed upon. For instance:
Personally I feel cheated by the fact I have to pay for public schools. My wife and I don't have children, we don't want any. I see myself having to pay for the -tongue in cheek humor- mistakes ( ok, most of them were probably planned) made by others. I realize I'm in the minority here, and disliking children probably earns me a seat on the wackjob bus. Even though I hate the little buggers, I wouldn't try and make anyone stop having children; that would infringe on your freedoms.
Could government work A la carte, that way everyone can participate in and reap the benefits of, only what they have paid into?Last edited by Spect; 03-25-2010 at 08:29 PM.