Did you read the article? IF the Gay World Series is a "public accomidation" AND sexual orientation is a protected class under state law, then it seems that there is at least SOME rational basis for the suit.

IF on the other hand, the alliance (and the World Series) is strictly private, then it seems MUCH less likely that there is anywhere for the suit to go.

That question, however, is one that will need to be decided by the court.

To what seems to be your point....wait...what's your point? Lawsuits are bad? Lawsuits based on sexual orientation discrimination are bad? Foie Gras is murder (tasty, tasty murder)?

And your questions: I think we had the answer to the Boy Scouts question, already. And the Catholic Church only gives certain "rights" to Catholics, correct? And to heterosexuals....and I think they are still tax-exempt.