Originally Posted by
Jeltz
There has been quite a bit of talk here in the UK about having professional jurors for such things as fraud cases where complicated matters can be hard for "normal" people to understand unless they have has special training.
Personally I think it would be better if being a juror was a job in its own right and that there was a core of working jurors with part time juror jobs being available to make up numbers.
All too often we read of people who don't understand the importance and who end up being charged with contempt because they did something stupid while on jury duty examples in the last couple of years IIRC were listening to an MP3 player or pulling a sicky to go to a West End show or contacting the defendant on facebook. While it wouldn't guarantee a better quality of juror at least they would know what they should and shouldn't do a bit better and it would still be one's peers just peers that are used to sitting in on trials.