EXCEEDINGLY strange.
Obama Warned To Prepare For Hillary Clinton Death | EUTimes.net
No idea how true or untrue it might be.
Printable View
EXCEEDINGLY strange.
Obama Warned To Prepare For Hillary Clinton Death | EUTimes.net
No idea how true or untrue it might be.
Wullie, I think it probably happened so he could develop an argument based on "plausible deniability." :rofl2:
I'm sure there is a lot more than we are being told or will ever be told. ;)
We all know the theory that the CIA killed JFK...could this be a rehashing of that old idea?
Anything is possible but is it likely?
Bob
I don't think so. HC has been an asset to BO as Sec/State, and since he's subject to term limits, I don't think he really cares what she does/does not do in the future as he's also getting a new Sec/State.
Edit: However, CIA usually runs their own playbook without any real oversight.
As far as JFK getting killed? Look at the last bill he signed and the first bill that LBJ signed and you'll see why Kennedy got killed.
He was in the process of shutting down the Federal Reserve Bank. LBJ put a stop to that REAL quick. ;)
Follow the money.
AS for Hillary? She and her hubby have a lot of unexplained deceased acquaintances. ;)
Do I have everybody's permission to put on my tinfoil hat now? :roflmao
I thought you wore it 24/7. :p
I thought she had said she was getting out of politics anyway several months ago. I assumed then it meant after the election. As for what goes on behind the scenes I don't think anybody could tell the whole story of any issue except maybe the head of the CIA. I am not a big conspiracy guy but I do read what they say. It does make sense that big business and politics is a lot like a legal mafia. A few guys in control of the whole world is hard to fathom but influence it yes. I find stories like this interesting but I don't let them side track me from the reality of it all. I live by this motto my dad had, " Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see." It keeps me in the middle of the road watching both sides. My conclusion is that we need to concentrate on the basics as far as what is wrong in this world. The fact that we can't figure out the truth and don't know who to trust is the problem. Not who did what, where, when why, who says. Keeps everyone from looking at where we are going and how to get there. Instead we argue about insignificant facts and raw data. Rant rant rant ? Do I have to get on a soap box and lead this world to utopia or should I just shut up and sharpen razors.
Gentlemen, as a conservative I have no love lost for the Clinton's political stance, but as a Moderator on SRP I think if this discussion is going to continue we need to keep it respectful..
So let's refrain for name calling here please..
Thanks for understanding
Glen Senior Mod SRP
Yes please. Whether someone is in the same political sector as you or not, we're all human beings worthy of being respected as human beings.
Or as we'd say in Texas, "She's havin' a hard time right now. Bless her heart." :)
I'm no fan of HC. That having been said, she's a probably a whole lot smarter than most people I've ever met or even heard of. Her intelligence is not in question, rather it's her agenda.
I don't know how things work in the US, but I'd have thought contingencies for the death of the Secretary of State (regardless of who the actual incumbent is) would be considered prudent practice from a Government. Of course you'd need to weigh up the probability that such a scenario would ever arise, but I would say there are such plans in place for all major positions in Govt.
Personally I have a lot of admiration for Hilary Clinton. When you consider her achievements and remove the politics from the equation, I feel she is a person worthy of much respect.
James.
Flash back: I once interviewed an individual that had previously work for the CIA.
The added Official statement on his résumé stated that while his previous employer neither confirmed or denied that statements in the document, they did give him permission to provide it!!
Impressive.
So your CIA are a bit like our ASIO then?! :)
Mick
You're original source doesn't appear to be credible.
From the same issue:
Obama Death Squads Fan Out Across America As Rebellion Looms | EUTimes.net
‘Islamization of Europe a good thing’ – Rabbi | EUTimes.net
Eternal life nearly reality | EUTimes.net
European Union Times - RationalWiki
I've been in the entertainment business in NYC for almost 40 years. Worked for television networks, on special events, shows, etc. I've put scenery up in studios for all the networks and have worked on remotes and on interviews with man on the street to Presidents.
The one thing that I have learned is this. There are the facts and then there is the news. The two aren't necessarily the same.
"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one."
A. J. Liebling
I wonder how many know what a VNR is and how they are made and used.
Video news release.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuo3jD22MIw
So the conspiracy theorists are mostly right then huh?! ;)
Mick
What do yo mean 'jumped on the band-wagon'?! I never knew I had gotten off the darn thing! :p
Mick
That tinfoil hat is "The Cat's Meow!"
Nice work, Cheetah! :rofl2:
I love it when a alleged news agency falls for an Onion story. It's happened more than a couple times. The last two I remember were, Iran believing that the US had addmitted that they were to weak to address Iran's issues. And this one, China's Communist Party newspaper falls for Onion story about Kim Jong Un | Fox News
All that aside, I'm sure what the government doesn't tell us would be an amount that we probably wouldn't believe!
"I love it when a alleged news agency falls for an Onion story."
As I said to Wullie, "Your original source doesn't appear to be credible."
Fox Nation reports Onion article about Obama email as true - National Political Buzz | Examiner.com