Printable View
Funny story that we will have to talk more about at the Mile High Meet...
Back in the early 80's when DPD was still carrying revolvers, I remember a few friends complaining that they were not allowed to carry the Colt Python because of the tight tolerances.. They were so tight that they could actually lock the cylinder, if not cared for meticulously, at least this was the story from the "Powers that be"
Ah ya had to mention the Colt Python, loved that revolver. Never had a problem with it seizing up due to tight tolerances though. It was the nicest factory stock revolver I have ever used.
Bob
Me too! I think my next adventure (if I dare) is to learn and love the 1911 and the .45ACP. It does feel great on my hip. I have a nice leather Gould & Goodrich paddle holster. It feels real sweet. And I think this 9mm guy is liking the idea of slinging huge, ugly chunks of 230gr HPs!Quote:
Originally Posted by BobH
Two things that Python owners who shot them a lot learned: leading at the cylinder face and the forcing cone would cause a noticeable drag on the cylinder rotating and running hot loads were just enough to back the the screw thread on the ejector rod out. Nobody was really using Loctite back then. Occasionally, the ejector rod would back out far enough that it would get trapped in the milled slot and you could not open the cylinder. Those of us fortunate to own a Python always brushed the cylinder face and forcing cone after a box or two of ball and got the habit of tightening the ejector rods from time to time.Quote:
Originally Posted by BobH
Shot mine a fair amount over ten or so years but the amount that some would that is for sure. After shooting I would always give it a thorough cleaning. The thorough cleaning ritual I guess is pretty important for most guns as opposed to just a lick and a polish. AKs were made for those types of users.;)
Bob
I have a Taurus pt1911 and love it. I shot a Kimber side by side with my Taurus and both shot equally well. I could get 4 of the Taurus for the price of that Kimber. Along with that one I have several other Taurus pistols and am happy with all of them. people either love or hate them.
I believe the op stated the problem himself in the following quote "double stack". I don't mean to be derogatory, I just think that that weapon should be viewed in a different light than a true 1911. You can still have a blast at the range with it, just dont expect it to perform like something it is not or it can't possibly live up to expectations. Apples and oranges is all. Just snicker at the next guy at the range who is reloading twice to your once and you will find the enjoyment in your purchase that you have been looking for.
I dunno, I don't see how a magazine that is properly designed and built to hold rounds staggered shooting rimless ammo should be a problem. OTH my only experience with that type of mag in a pistol was shooting service issue Canadian made Browning Hi Powers with service issue ball. Have to say I don't recall a lot of trouble with them due to the mag layout. Atrocious triggers as issued though.
Bob
I have to agree. Nonetheless, my thinking process that any Para would be better than any Taurus is in and of itself flawed.Quote:
Originally Posted by BobH
To move FROM a proven platform (the 1911) to an in proven double stack iteration of the same seem to be a bit if a miss.
I dunno? Please don't tell me I have to buy ANOTHER gun! That'd break my heart.
Okay, which 1911 should I buy under $1500? There's the new topic!
All you 1911 enthusiasts.... SHOOT!
:-)
~mc
That's a tough one, because there are so many new entries to consider. I have and love a basic, full size Kimber in Stainless that I love. I also, at different times have had a Colt and a Springfield Armory...both also basic, duty type pistols. Of the three, I kept the Kimber because it was very good looking AND more importantly it was the most accurate and easy to shoot well.Quote:
Originally Posted by DamnStraight
Attachment 161338
