Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Still Trying

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member IsaacRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    El Paso, TX :(
    Posts
    847
    Thanked: 220

    Default Still Trying

    Well im still trying to get my white balance as nice as Max. Its frustrating as heck to see so many nice pictures out there and my pictures either look "powdery" or just not bright.

    Well...the back drop is a light light gray, not quite white.

    Discuss


  2. #2
    Senior Member gandrw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids Mi.
    Posts
    364
    Thanked: 82

    Default

    I think the problem is the MONT BLANC pen in the picture, You should just send that and any others you have to me to be taken care of. This will take care of any photo issues that would otherwise be unsolvable.

    Sorry I don't have any real advice about photography. Just wanted to say thats a nice pen.

  3. #3
    Senior Member RobertH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fall River, NS
    Posts
    266
    Thanked: 58

    Default

    That pen's so nice I would feel bad letting ink get on it...

  4. #4
    Senior Member IsaacRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    El Paso, TX :(
    Posts
    847
    Thanked: 220

    Default

    Thank you all very much

  5. #5
    Senior Member leadduck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Concord, NH
    Posts
    1,287
    Thanked: 274

    Default

    Not knowing your camera, it's hard to respond intelligently, but I'm assuming you've tried the automatic WB setting as well as the settings that are approptiate to your light source. If you have mixed light sources, i.e., incandenscent and flourescant, the automatic setting is probably best. If your camera has the capability for custom white balance, this should give you the most accurate color with a single light source. If your camera is limited in this respect, you may have to do some post-processing in Photoshop or its much less costly cousins such as Photoshop Elements. Then again, your sample shot looks pretty darn good, in my opinion.

  6. #6
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Egads! I have created a monster. Whats this? four posts in the off topic areas in under 48 hours? Next you'll be starting a political thread of your own

  7. #7
    Senior Member gandrw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids Mi.
    Posts
    364
    Thanked: 82

    Default

    Another option to Photoshop is the free photo program Picasa from Google it lets you do basic fixes on things like light levels and shadowing.

  8. #8
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gandrw View Post
    Another option to Photoshop is the free photo program Picasa from Google it lets you do basic fixes on things like light levels and shadowing.
    yeah, but then don't you risk washing out like this?

    Name:  DSC_0101.jpg
Views: 144
Size:  17.7 KB
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  9. #9
    Senior Member IsaacRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    El Paso, TX :(
    Posts
    847
    Thanked: 220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leadduck View Post
    Not knowing your camera, it's hard to respond intelligently, but I'm assuming you've tried the automatic WB setting as well as the settings that are approptiate to your light source. If you have mixed light sources, i.e., incandenscent and flourescant, the automatic setting is probably best. If your camera has the capability for custom white balance, this should give you the most accurate color with a single light source. If your camera is limited in this respect, you may have to do some post-processing in Photoshop or its much less costly cousins such as Photoshop Elements. Then again, your sample shot looks pretty darn good, in my opinion.
    Well I have a photobox that has Fluorescent lights at 5k. I have the WB set to 5k. Im wondering if i just simply dont have enough light at all. I may look into a flash with a bounce umbrella. I dont have a great deal of space to work, so that may be my option.

  10. #10
    Senior Member leadduck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Concord, NH
    Posts
    1,287
    Thanked: 274

    Default

    The best option is custom white balancing if your camera allows it. This involves setting it at Custom in the menu and taking a shot of a gray card or a white card under the same lighting conditions your shooting your subject. This is the equvalent of using a light meter to measure rather than estimate your exposure. If your camera is accurate, you should get precision results. What camera are you shooting with?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •