Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member medic484's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    western ma
    Posts
    164
    Thanked: 19

    Default coticule sizes for smiles

    should I go with a 6x2 coticule or 8x2, is the larger a luxory or a significant advantage, especially when honing old razors like wedges and smiley Sheffields? or any other thoughts on this approch?

  2. #2
    Beard growth challenged
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanked: 402

    Default

    I'd take the bigger one.
    Size never disturbs, but a lack thereof can well do.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to 0livia For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-15-2009)

  4. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I agree with Olivia, I've got stones in both sizes. You'll adjust your stroke to the stone but more stone will give you more stroke and you'll save time with the longer stone.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-15-2009)

  6. #4
    Unique. Like all of you. Oldengaerde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Uithof - NL
    Posts
    518
    Thanked: 327

    Default

    Idem. With hones I think longer is most always better.

    To digress slightly: with smiles (and warps) the width can make a difference in the sense that some (especially beginning?) honers (including myself) feel it is easier to get them evenly sharp on narrower hones.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Oldengaerde For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-16-2009)

  8. #5
    Senior Member medic484's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    western ma
    Posts
    164
    Thanked: 19

    Default

    Thats exactly what I was intending to use the coticule for Oldengearten did I spell that right

  9. #6
    Senior Member Pyment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    939
    Thanked: 129

    Default

    I keep a 1 inch (width) coti for just this situation (OK so I have 2). As I hone more, however, I find myself saying "this razor needs the narrow hone" less often and adjust my stroke rather than changing hones. In this case, the length comes in handy.

    IOW, get the longer hone. You will appreciate that length later.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Pyment For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-16-2009)

  11. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    325
    Thanked: 127

    Default

    If your budget can afford it, go with the larger stone. Consider how much of the stone isn't used when honing. You will lose, at least, the width of the blade just to set up the stroke, and you will probably stop short of the end at the finish of the strke.

    So an average blade width of say 5/8 will require at least 3/4" to start and probably will stop at 1/2" from the end. That's 1-1/4" of unused stone. Now your 6" stone has a real usable length of 4-3/4". You can work in that length, but it will be slow

    JMHO

    Ray

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to rayman For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-17-2009)

  13. #8
    Senior Member Pyment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    939
    Thanked: 129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rayman View Post
    you will probably stop short of the end at the finish of the stroke.

    This is especially true for when you use slurry. You want to stop short so you can use the slurry for the return stroke. So, you lose the width of the blade twice. This can be as much as 2 inches.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Pyment For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-17-2009)

  15. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,588
    Thanked: 286

    Default

    i always stop short to keep water or slurry on my coti i have two ones a bout 7in long and starts out at 2 1/2 in to about an inch at very end i have a 8 inc long bout which is for warped or smilys 3.5 cm to 2.5 and its great but my ideal size would be 7 in long and max 2 in wide. so i guess i'd go for 8x2

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to gary haywood For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-17-2009)

  17. #10
    Senior Member blabbermouth niftyshaving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,157
    Thanked: 852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medic484 View Post
    should I go with a 6x2 coticule or 8x2, is the larger a luxory or a significant advantage, especially when honing old razors like wedges and smiley Sheffields? or any other thoughts on this approch?
    What other stones do you have?

    If you have an empty box of rocks go for the longer stone. With
    one good coticule you may never need another stone in a lifetime.
    If you get the bug I suspect you will begin picking up a rock collection
    and a 4k-x-8k norton at 3"x8" is not expensive then you will be
    drooling over some glass Shaptons like the 16K and 30K and they are
    in the same size range (210 mm x 70 mm)....

    Having said that, the six inch stone is just fine. Mine is about
    that size....

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to niftyshaving For This Useful Post:

    medic484 (12-17-2009)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •