View Poll Results: Which one would you buy?
- Voters
- 20. You may not vote on this poll
-
I have used both, I would buy the Naniwa
11 55.00% -
I have used both, I would buy the Norton
6 30.00% -
Other, type down
3 15.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 23
Hybrid View
-
03-17-2011, 09:03 PM #1
Norton 4k/8k or Naniwa 3k/8k to buy?
I want to ask those who have them, or have used them. Which one would you buy of the two? I know both are good, and have different disadvantages. I read a lot about both stones, but I am still struggling
Are there any advantages to the Norton over the Naniwa?
-
03-17-2011, 09:22 PM #2
I think it is largely personal preference. I like the Naniwas, but I prefer a 5k to the 3k.
-
03-17-2011, 09:31 PM #3
You won't be unhappy with any of them. gl
Last edited by hi_bud_gl; 03-18-2011 at 01:43 PM.
-
03-18-2011, 10:41 AM #4
I am curious about a few opinions, because I read only one comment who said that he likes his norton better, and a lot of comments about liking the naniwa better. The others did mostly try only one of them.
-
03-18-2011, 11:52 AM #5
The Naniwa's are slow cutting but give a smooth edge and : the Nortons - and I'm only goin on other threads I've seen - are consistant, reliable workhorses, that cut relatively quick.
Others will chime in with more experience I'm sure.
-
03-18-2011, 12:26 PM #6
Can't speak for the Nortons, but I have a Naniwa 3k/8k combo stone and it has been great. The 3-8 jump is a bit much, but it just means more laps at the 8k. My naniwa has treated me very well.
-
03-19-2011, 01:30 AM #7
The difference is mostly in feedback and price not very much in the end result, so I don't know what a poll gives you.
Prioritize what's important to you specifically and pick the one that fits better.
I own a set of naniwa superstones which replaced my nortons, but that doesn't mean you'd like them better the way I do and you'll probably pay more, although since you're in europe that may be different too.