So is this a super stone?
Printable View
So is this a super stone?
Bump.
Are there no takers for this question?
May we speculate therefore that there is no tangible benefit from going up to the 30k Shapton?
Long live the 16k!
I would say there is a tangible benefit. I have definitely seen an improvement in the smoothness of the shave following the Shapton 30K. I have the Professional not the GlassStone. Harrelson Stanely, the USA distributor, says the Glass is a different formula so I cannot speak to that model. From my personal experience I would say you can probably do as well with the Lynn Abrams felt strop and the 0.5 diamond spray for a whole lot less money. :shrug:
For me so far, I have better performance from the Shapton Glass 30K than with Chrome Oxide. What I find is that my edges maintain the keenness with the 30K better than with the chrome oxide which rounds it off. I suspect its based on my own experience and capability with the different media.
I don't have a lot of time with the 30K, as I just don't hone razors as much as others here.
Hones last longer than strop pasting, that's well known. Another reason why I want to try the Shapton 30k as a finishing stone.Quote:
Originally Posted by xChris
I was meaning the edge that I initially produce (i.e., before any shaving). The Shapton mainains that fine, keen edge better than when I use chrome oxide on a razor (where I seem to dull it down more than I should -- my lack of good technique & experience).
I haven't honed enough razors, and gotten a feel for time between touchups yet. But, I don't think it is any worse than using the finer pastes right now (and probably better, but I don't have the hard evidence of that). I honed a Geneva 1/2 hollow with it, and it mainained a great edge for quie a while. When the edge did deteriorate, however, it was apparent. I hit it with 0.9 boron carbide, and 0.5 chrome oxide; I need to go back through the 16K & 30K, and see if I can tell a difference from the pastes I used.