Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I just want to point out that looking at edges under magnification, needs to interpreted, just like any other test or probing method.
I'd like to present a link to a previous post of mine, where I presented 4 pictures of the exact same spot of an edge with the same equipment, only a different lighting angle.
http://straightrazorpalace.com/advan...ent-light.html
On the same note, almost no optical microscope will show artifacts below approximately 1 micron, and you even need very decent optics to reach that level of optical resolution. Some high end 10X loupes show more detail than a cheap 100X device called "microscope". Not that those devices are inapt for honing purposes. It's just that most 200X pictures cannot reveal more detail than a decent 30X image, but because of the higher magnification, they show more space between those details, which makes any edge above 8K look really smooth.
And... (still not done with killing the party). No optical microsope is capable of showing the width of the bevel tip, which is the only thing that defines an edge's keenness. Scanning electron microscopes have the ability to do that. Anybody fancy one?
eBay.be: ISI-SS40 ELECTRON SCANNING MICROSCOPE (object 390030432521 eindtijd 16-feb-09 01:59:55 CET)
Please don't read this wrong: I really like to use magnification when I'm honing. But I have found out the hard way, that no scope will make your razor sharper. It is a useful aid, nearly as useful as my thumb when I perform the TPT.
Bart.