Results 1 to 10 of 23

Threaded View

  1. #10
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,992
    Thanked: 13236
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Basset View Post
    And in this context you mean cutting the hairs with no blade contact with the skin?
    I keep seeing this question, and I am realizing that like every other test, this one has gone much farther, and developed over the years into more than what it was originally designed for...

    The test was a go / no go test when it started, for a completed bevel set, that was it and it is still 99% accurate if used that way...

    As a qualitative test, it also works by testing the way the blade cuts hair as you progress through the grits/stages, of honing, but once you do that it, loses the accuracy of the test, and it becomes more like a HHT and more subjective to the individual type of hair...
    I can use it to gauge the "sharpness" as I progress, but I can't say it will work the same for you... See the slight difference there???

    If the edge cuts hair at skin level or above, along the entire edge then the "bevel" is set, that part is pretty darn accurate...

    Every other type of testing you do with it has to be developed for each individual...
    Last edited by gssixgun; 05-08-2010 at 07:48 AM.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    nessmuck (05-08-2010), Terje K (05-08-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •