Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree10Likes
  • 1 Post By Fenster
  • 2 Post By Wullie
  • 1 Post By JimmyHAD
  • 4 Post By pixelfixed
  • 1 Post By
  • 1 Post By

Thread: Ashton & Jackson - age?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    100
    Thanked: 36

    Default Ashton & Jackson - age?

    I recently picked up an Ashton & Jackson at a flea market. I have been trying to find some info but all I have come across is a reference to the name being changed (Ashton dropped) in 1852. Is this razor really pre 1852?
    Name:  #11 A & J 2 (1280x816).jpg
Views: 289
Size:  16.3 KBName:  #10 - A & J  1 (1280x853).jpg
Views: 262
Size:  20.3 KB
    Substance likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I don't know, but if it isn't stamped Made In England it is pre-1889. From the look of it, with those kind of straight scales, I'd say it is probably an early one. Somebody who knows them well will be along. Nice find.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    100
    Thanked: 36

    Default

    The tang stamp is - Ashton & Jackson Norfolk Street Shefield. So, all of them after 1889 are marked "Made In England"?

  4. #4
    Thread derailment specialist. Wullie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Republica de Tejas
    Posts
    2,792
    Thanked: 884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    The tang stamp is - Ashton & Jackson Norfolk Street Shefield. So, all of them after 1889 are marked "Made In England"?
    That's the generally accepted answer. Others say 1892 because of the McKinley Tariff Act of 1891 which among other things stated that all items imported into the US had to be marked with their country of origin. However, if an item was not made or intended for export to the US, it didn't have to marked with the country of origin.
    JimmyHAD and Geezer like this.
    Member Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club, participant SE Asia War Games 1972-1973. The oath I swore has no statute of limitation.

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wullie View Post
    That's the generally accepted answer. Others say 1892 because of the McKinley Tariff Act of 1891 which among other things stated that all items imported into the US had to be marked with their country of origin. However, if an item was not made or intended for export to the US, it didn't have to marked with the country of origin.
    I don't know where I keep getting 1889 ? Stuck in my brain somehow. That Tariff act was the deal I was talking about. OTOH, 1889 just sounds better .......
    Wullie likes this.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  6. #6
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Roseville,Kali
    Posts
    10,432
    Thanked: 2027

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyHAD View Post
    I don't know where I keep getting 1889 ? Stuck in my brain somehow. That Tariff act was the deal I was talking about. OTOH, 1889 just sounds better .......
    The year you fell outa your mamas bottom jimmy
    CAUTION
    Dangerous within 1 Mile

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •