View Poll Results: What is the rockwell hardness on a carbon steel razor

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • 35 ~ 45

    0 0%
  • 45 ~ 55

    4 17.39%
  • 55 ~ 65

    18 78.26%
  • 65 ~ 75

    1 4.35%
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,304
    Thanked: 1

    Default How Hard Are The Vintage Blades

    Yesterday was the best day to find another something to do...
    Last edited by urleebird; 12-21-2006 at 12:53 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ToxIk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    667
    Thanked: 73

    Default

    Very interesting inquiry, Bill. I'm quite curious to know the results myself. What I think would be equally interesting is to have some sort of metalurgical analysis done on a few blades. So we can see exactly how much of each element when into the steel. Unfourtunently, as I understand it, such analysis would result in the destruction of the blade.

    About the poll: Isn't a range of 10 HRC kind of wide? If I recall, when I was looking at some knifes, there were almost all within 5HRC of each other.

  3. #3
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,304
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    Yesterday was the best day to find another something to do...
    Last edited by urleebird; 12-21-2006 at 12:53 AM.

  4. #4
    Electric Razor Aficionado
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,396
    Thanked: 346

    Default

    I know nothing about metallurgy so I don't have any face to lose, but I've always assumed the vintage sheffield blades were 57-60, the pumas and swedes were 59-62, the americans were 60-62, and the friodurs were 61-63.

    Edit: Some guys have PM'ed about this. This is just a guesstimate. Puma knives are hardened to 57-59 accd to info I've seen, and I've always heard that 65+ is essentially unhoneable due to hardness and brittleness. Since I use an arkansas stone on both my knives and razors, I'm interpolating between these two extremes based on how they feel on the hone -- this may or may not be reliable. Puma tests all their knives for hardness, at least all of mine have a little indentation from where the diamond pressed into the steel, and all of my Puma knives have a very consistent feel on the hone that is similar to how my best sheffields feel, so I really doubt that the vintage sheffields are much lower or higher than this.
    Last edited by mparker762; 12-06-2006 at 04:36 PM. Reason: explication

  5. #5
    Loudmouth FiReSTaRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Etobicoke, ON
    Posts
    7,171
    Thanked: 64

    Default

    I was thinking of the ballpark of 60 as someone mentioned it here earlier. I'm glad my assumption was correct. A better question would be "how hard would be too hard to hone with our gear, within a reasonable amount of time?"

  6. #6
    Senior Member superfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,950
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Id say pretty soft, 45-55. But maybe even lower...

    Nenad

  7. #7
    Senior Member wvbias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    1,397
    Thanked: 21

    Default

    Out of pure ignorance I will say somewhere
    around 60. A good middle ground for
    baby bear - not too hard and not too soft.

    But then baby bear doesn't shave....



    Terry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •