Search:

Forunately, Wikipedia still works:




Jokes aside, I'm glad we all agree that as far as honing qualities are concerned and irrespective of collectibility, names and labels don't say that much.

Why is it that members can make the rashest of claims, yet those who question them need to tiptoe? And can after writing that hardly get away without adding disclaimers as "not that I mean to say...

No label, yet 'probably' an Escher. Really? Please elaborate. The conjecture seems baseless and, moreover, adding it is out of tune with the gist of what you write (and with which I heartily agree)....

See also this post and the responses below it.