Printable View
Fresh in from across the Atlantic. I rarely see stubtails in pairs, or in ivory. I'm sure they were reground, but long ago. It's a shame about the rust, but that can be lightly cleaned away. I'm not sure if the case is original. I haven't had time to do any research yet, but figured posting pictures would be pertinent.
Attachment 144764
Attachment 144765
Attachment 144766
Attachment 144767
Attachment 144768
Nice, whats the other little tool in the box?
I'm not sure, it looks like some kind of nail tool, like the smaller tool on fingernail clippers. Looks newer than the set.Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelfixed
Ahh, it was you who got them!
Being from Sweden / Scandinavia, do you know anything of the history of them? To me the name sounds like it is from that area.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
Stunning...wow...to hold a piece of history like that in your hands.
To imagine all the faces and all the places and lifetimes it's witnessed..sheesh...sounds like they could of been around during the French Revolution!!
Simply awe inspiring...
That is too cool! How do you date those? Where did you find them? They must have been extremely well cared for. I wonder what the carbon content is.
Dated very roughly based on blade and scale shape and experience. Found online.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobaloo
I really like those stubs you have there.
excellent score
what site did you find them on??
what makes you think they were reground? Look pretty original to me for stub tails
Mostly experience. These would have had a glaze or crocus finish, and the grinding is very obviously a rough grinding that you often see from oldschool regrinds - hard to tell from pictures, but once it's in person you can tell (I was hoping these were original finish from the seller's pics, but probably not the case). Also, there is evidence of pitting that has been sanded down in the past, so I know that someone has tried refinishing at least parts of the blade.Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedOak
edit: also, just because something is reground, doesn't mean the shape has to be drastically altered. What I've seen from razors of this period, is that often they would grind not only the blade, but also the tang and tail. This was often done very well, and it's sometimes hard to detect unless you know what you're looking at. But the grinding would take such a small amount of steel off that you can't judge based on the shape of the blade whether it has been ground.
They are not reground blades JMO
Never heard of them but the name "Grönstrand" is quite normal here, (Grön - Green, Strand - Beach)Quote:
Originally Posted by ScienceGuy
Think I just found him; Grönstrand, Nils, rakknivssmed. (Rakkniv - Straight Razor, Smed - Smith)
He is mentioned in a book; Eskilstuna, en Svensk märkesstad: kloster-, slotts- och industri-stadens öden genom seklerna i historisk belysning, by Knut Hellberg, written in 1919 - 1920 about industries in Eskilstuna.
Digitalen: Eskilstuna en märkesstad del 1 och 2 1919
Here comes the crux, part 1 and 2 of the book is digitalized, not part 3 that he's in!
I am thinking like pixel on this one. Not that I know much but they would have had to grind a lot of detail and the stamp would be missing. The hollow would be a rather course grind in the first place.
These razors were almost certainly put on a grinding wheel to clean off rust and remove pitting. It was a thing that was done pretty commonly.Quote:
Originally Posted by 10Pups
I know these days when we see 'regrind' we think of an old wedge that's been concaved, but that isn't always what it meant.
Henry Lummus complained about the practice:
By analogy to other antiques, an old razor of good style, in proof condition, with the original polish unimpaired by grinding, excessive honing, or rust, and with a perfect original handle, is a prize. But such a condition rarely obtains, and usually the grinder must be employed to restore the blade by removing rust and grinding out the long bevel caused by many years of honing.
Well that explains why my searching through the digitized versions turned up nothing, ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
Looking at it again, I'm 99.99% certain this has been reground. Stamps go deep, and usually are left intact after regrinding (we're talking a light brush on the surface to get it shiny again, which doesn't take off a lot of metal. Nowadays when we hear 'regrind' we often associate it with changing some shape of the blade). See below:Quote:
I am thinking like pixel on this one. Not that I know much but they would have had to grind a lot of detail and the stamp would be missing. The hollow would be a rather course grind in the first place.
Wostenholm, complete regrind of blade face, tang, and tail. This one has little spots of crocus polish left, so I know with absolute certainty it was reground; but on first inspection you might not be able to tell. Also, the angles on the tang have been kept very sharp:
Attachment 144782
Aux, complete regrind all over. Clark and Hall, ground on the blade:
Attachment 144783
Again, it's hard to see from the photographs, but the surface is quite roughly finished by razor standards even though it looks like a mirror. The maker would have finished them to a higher degree before releasing them.
This might help clarify:
Attachment 144790
Two razors, one has had its finish reground, the other hasn't.
Attachment 144791
In the closeup, it's obvious.
Attachment 144792
Yet another reason you've got to be careful buying things from eBay. It can be really hard to spot in a photo, depending on the light.
Here's the pair after some cleaning. I unpinned them and sanded to get the active rust off. I approximated a glaze finish on the tangs and crocus on the blades. Upon taking them apart, there was about a 0.5-1 mm dip in the steel before the point that was covered by the scales, so they'd had some drastic reshaping done, but I'm not sure if they'd ever been unpinned. There's also a slight angle change on the bottom of the tang, which usually happens when a shoulder is cut in, but in this case I think these blades were much bigger originally.
Attachment 145329
Attachment 145330
Attachment 145331
I don't have the experience go the other posters here, thanks for showing these off. It really helps with my education on these. It seems that a good way to look for the regrind would be to look for striations in the blade. I am curious why wouldn't the person doing the regrind wouldn't try and polish those out? From these pics I don't see striations on the blades.
Regrinding, especially back in the early 1800's, consisted of 1) a guy who knew (or mostly knew) how to do it 2) a stool 3) a grinding wheel, powered by a pedal. Some grinders had more things -- the tools to take apart and reassemble, the scales to completely rescale, etc -- but the most common one was a guy sitting on a street corner somewhere, or just between two buildings, shouting that he'd grind your razors for {small amount of money}.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobaloo
Attachment 145338
Detail from Hogarth's "The Enraged Musician", 1741. A knife grinder.
Some street grinders specialized, but many would use their wheel on anything you paid them to do.
Attachment 145339
Cries of London, Plate 6 'Knives, Scissars, and Razors to Grind.' by F. Wheatly R.A., engraved by Giovanni Vendramini, 1795
Attachment 145340
'The Cries of Paris - The Knife Grinder' by Simon François Ravenet, 1737
Attachment 145343
Engraving from "Old London Street Cries and the Cries of To-day" by Andrew White Tuer and Thomas Rowlandson
It was a practice that continued on for a long, long time.
Attachment 145341
Knife grinder, Washington D.C. -- by Herbert A. French, sometime between 1912 and 1930
You might notice a common element here. There are zero grit progressions or alternates. The street grinder had one stone and he used that for all its worth.
Awesome history.
VERY cool! Thanks for sharing.
Looking at this and think to myself... What a wonderful world ! :p
[QUOTE=ScienceGuy;1235377]I approximated a glaze finish on the tangs and crocus on the blades.
What kind of wheels and compounds do you use to do this?
[QUOTE=thp001;1920149]I don't really have a setup so this was as best as can be approximated with unidirectional hand sanding and sanding formsQuote:
Originally Posted by ScienceGuy
