Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree69Likes

Thread: Joseph Rodgers 10/8 razor, possibly an earlier model?

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    128
    Thanked: 118

    Default Joseph Rodgers 10/8 razor, possibly an earlier model?

    Name:  IMG_20170719_195742.jpg
Views: 380
Size:  40.5 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_193628.jpg
Views: 409
Size:  36.0 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_194454.jpg
Views: 361
Size:  36.8 KB

    Hey, I was the one to get this Joseph Rodgers from the 'bay recently and must say that I am just tickled pink with it. The seller had listed the razor as "1-7/32-inch wide" but as you can see in the photos below I found it to be a true 10/8 and even a shade more. Total weight is 3.55 ounces or 100g, compared to 4.35 ounces for my other 10/8 Rodgers.

    Name:  IMG_20170719_141528.jpg
Views: 379
Size:  27.3 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_141539.jpg
Views: 376
Size:  27.6 KB

    The blade has more of what I consider to be the classic Sheffield style with the slight smile to the edge and swayback to the spine compared to my other Joseph Rodgers 10/8 razor (which I have seen other examples and know some of you have). I believe this razor must be an earlier production, evidenced by the lack of "England" on the tang stamp.

    Name:  IMG_20170719_193741.jpg
Views: 380
Size:  41.7 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_193844.jpg
Views: 387
Size:  36.2 KB

    Also, note that the tang stamp has a weird curve to it; ScienceGuy had this to say about it, "What's most interesting to me is the distortion of the stamp - it looks as if the stamp was applied and the blade was given a last shaping before hardening." Compared to my other 10/8 Rodgers, this one has a smaller tang, more rounded spine, thinner lighter scales, and a thinner grind, more half hollow versus the quarter hollow of the other.

    Name:  IMG_20170719_194608.jpg
Views: 350
Size:  18.8 KB

    The scales are just top notch, no cracking or delamination caused by drying out. The horn is the deepest black with just a hint of brown translucency at the tips. Scales are perfectly straight with no warping and the blade closes dead center with good tension on the pivot throughout the arc.

    Name:  IMG_20170719_141812.jpg
Views: 354
Size:  23.8 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_141820.jpg
Views: 370
Size:  35.8 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_195532.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  33.4 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_195541.jpg
Views: 377
Size:  37.8 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_195630.jpg
Views: 355
Size:  35.3 KB

    Name:  IMG_20170719_195636.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  37.5 KB

    The third razor in the photos is my largest Joseph Elliot which is just a hair under 19/16 and a more traditional near wedge grind.

    I polished the razor up and honed it yesterday and took it for a test run today. I hadn't shaved since I won the auction so I had a good five day beard going, haha. The razor was quick to set a bevel (used one layer of 3M Super 88 tape along the spine) with a thin, even bevel along the entire length of the blade. Actually, near the round tip on the back side of the blade, the bevel didn't want to quite set. I tried some exaggerated J-strokes on my Chosera 1000, using a good bit of down force, but gave it up once it started cutting some arm hair (but not easily popping hairs like the rest of the edge).

    I found it didn't matter as the shave went great; the blade is LOUD, very audible with that thin grind on the lower part of the blade. I will definitely be using this razor for the next week as I like to play a game where I see how much of my face I can shave before the lather falls off, pretty sure I can get half my face with this one!

    Imgur album of the photos in slightly higher resolution

    Imgur album of my first 10/8 Rodgers

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to goldragon For This Useful Post:

    ScoutHikerDad (07-20-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •