Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: experiments

Threaded View

kevint experiments 01-21-2009, 07:39 PM
KristofferBodvin Now I want a nakyama even... 01-21-2009, 07:52 PM
kevint Hey Kris that site is a place... 01-21-2009, 08:00 PM
Bart TEST#1... 01-21-2009, 10:02 PM
Quick Good observation Bart. The... 01-21-2009, 10:11 PM
mparker762 The other big problem is that... 01-22-2009, 12:12 AM
kevint per Mr. AG. quote: "What I am... 01-22-2009, 12:48 AM
Quick Note that the picture with... 01-22-2009, 01:09 AM
kevint Ah. This is only my... 01-22-2009, 01:28 AM
JimmyHAD I'm certainly not an expert... 01-22-2009, 03:33 AM
kevint I think you are missing the... 01-22-2009, 04:50 AM
kevint Both Mr. Parker and JimmyHAD... 01-22-2009, 05:03 AM
Quick You're correct. It is a... 01-22-2009, 07:24 AM
kevint Quick, In what ways they... 01-22-2009, 12:24 PM
English I have tried and posted... 01-22-2009, 01:19 PM
mparker762 Not if you're just interested... 01-22-2009, 01:58 PM
mparker762 I'm quite sure he didn't. ... 01-22-2009, 02:13 PM
kevint You both are basing your... 01-22-2009, 10:11 PM
Bart I stand corrected about what... 01-22-2009, 10:57 PM
kevint Thank you for your reply... 01-23-2009, 12:07 AM
mparker762 His photos do not demonstrate... 01-23-2009, 01:46 AM
kevint Mr. Parker. I considered the... 01-23-2009, 03:09 PM
Quick Please, I fouind Mr. Parker's... 01-23-2009, 06:31 PM
mparker762 Finally found the Verhoeven... 01-23-2009, 06:36 PM
Seraphim One other issue with that... 01-24-2009, 06:13 AM
Quick Not really sure what we're... 01-24-2009, 07:11 AM
smythe buddy system ?.... like some... 01-25-2009, 02:44 AM
kevint My comments have been... 01-26-2009, 04:32 AM
kevint some could be pits, but I... 01-26-2009, 04:39 AM
kevint I have read the paper and... 01-26-2009, 04:55 AM
kevint Hi Bart. If i get what it is... 01-22-2009, 12:39 AM
Rajagra I just want to check... 01-23-2009, 01:04 AM
mparker762 yes. As I've stated several... 01-23-2009, 01:29 AM
kevint right. as labeled: 1/2 mm... 01-23-2009, 03:43 AM
Rajagra Yes, each division on that... 01-23-2009, 04:06 AM
  1. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevint View Post
    Mr. Parker. I considered the tone of replies to be quite negative. Your text overall; contradictory.
    Please, I fouind Mr. Parker's tone very much in line with yours to which I think he was responding. I found the content to be interesting, informative, and in my opinion, quite valid.
    "This kind of response, and I have seen it before. Along with the mindless buddy system of thanking up the rep, like some middle school popularity contest truly makes me question my participation here."

    So far the discussion has been directly to the topic. The analysis of the study, done by someone else, which you presented. I think it's fascinating, pertinent, and very worth dissecting. There's nothing wrong with attacking the data and/or methods used to reach a conclusion. I do not mean this to be inflammatory, but what did you find contradictory about Mr. Parker's text? If it was content, then please elaborate. If it was tone, then hopefully we can just let it drop.

    (Don't let this valuable thread die over this.)
    Last edited by Quick; 01-23-2009 at 06:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •