Results 11 to 20 of 25
Thread: Shapton 30k Usage
-
05-18-2009, 04:25 AM #11
-
05-18-2009, 11:28 AM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267I would make sure to finish with Chromium Oxide though. I have found that it is the one thing one can do that will add mountains of smoothness to a shave.
RLast edited by riooso; 05-18-2009 at 11:35 AM.
-
05-18-2009, 12:16 PM #13
-
05-19-2009, 12:19 AM #14
I have more disappoining results from chromium oxide than positive ones. the resulting edge from it almost always seems less keen (sounds a lot like my complaints with a coticule, huh).
Apparently, I like having an edge with "bite." For me, the SGS 30K gives a super smooth edge and the keenness that I'm looking for.
-
05-19-2009, 01:17 AM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267I have found that when it comes to edges it is definitely a personal thing. I have found, for Chromium, the harder the steel the better the results. I use to shave off 0.25 diamond and really liked it but when I went to Chromium I found that I can get a razor to sharp. I know, I know, some will say to sharp is not possible and I use to be one of them but with Chromium I get shaves that are velvet smooth.
Richard
-
05-19-2009, 07:43 PM #16
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 608
Thanked: 124
-
05-19-2009, 08:07 PM #17
Well, Ray, I only have the Shapton GS series
and the Nakayama, so I'm not looking at much
duplication there
I'm interested in shaving and honing, but not
collecting. The idea is to have my own razor
(a favourite), and have plenty of time to hone
razors for other folks.
Regards,
- Scott
-
05-20-2009, 12:32 AM #18
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 1,301
Thanked: 267
It is not if it is 0.5 micron Chromium Oxide. The rough formula is: Estimated Microns = (14755)/(Grit)
Using above formula for a 16K Shapton stone for instance:
Microns= (14755)/(16000)
= 0.922
The Shapton stone has the figure of 0.92 micron embossed under the glass. I have found this formula fairly reliable.
Take Care,
RichardLast edited by riooso; 05-20-2009 at 12:38 AM.
-
05-20-2009, 01:02 AM #19
-
05-20-2009, 12:39 PM #20
The problem I have with getting use from the numbers of the CrO is how the Cro is used. I look at it as an edge refiner and I imagine it breaking off micro burs in the grooves of the teeth. It also has a gentle abrasive factor involved but stopping off the edge is much different effect than honing it. Has it not been suggested that a stopping stroke or two on a hone corrects overhoning and gets rid of burs? Maybe an experiment with stropping on a 30K would be interesting. I would be more than happy to apply the scientific method if anyone wanted to donate a 30k shapton for my laboratory
Mike