Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Grit sizes

  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default Grit sizes

    When we say 4K/8K Norton, what grit size scale does that refer to? And are Shaptons measured with the same scale?

    There's a European, USA and Japanes grit size scale.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  2. #2
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm not sure that the 4k/8k even refers to a specific grit size. It is some kind of mysterious scale. Is there an expert in the house?
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  3. #3
    Beard growth challenged
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanked: 402

    Default

    Duh, reminds me to work on that table.

    Norton 4000 = F800 or JIS(new) 2000
    Norton 8000 = F1200 or JIS(new) 4000

  4. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I think of it as the ankle bone is connected to the shin bone, the shin bone connected to the knee bone, the knee bone connected to the thigh bone and so on. The analogy being start with the 1k to the 4k to the 8k and on up the ladder. Whatever they really are it is coarse to fine in practical application.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  5. #5
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    I do not believe I have ever seen a grit equivalency chart that I can believe. So Good Luck Olivia!

    All manufacturing has tolerances- what are those per manufacturer?

    8000 grit, whatever that means, will not be the same, even if they used equivalent sizes as one manufacturer may believe that 8000 grit should denote the smallest particle in the mix, while company B believes it should denote the largest.

  6. #6
    Woo hoo! StraightRazorDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,257
    Thanked: 309

    Default

    Just buy natural stones, then you'll never have to worry about the grit sizes.

  7. #7
    Beard growth challenged
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanked: 402

    Default

    Actually the FEPA standard says that 75% of the particles are of that size.
    The remaining 25% can be smaller or bigger.

  8. #8
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0livia View Post
    Actually the FEPA standard says that 75% of the particles are of that size.
    The remaining 25% can be smaller or bigger.
    Hee hee;( I was speaking hypothetically; internationally so. Even with this standard there is plenty of room to make one stone a "better polisher"

  9. #9
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0livia View Post
    Duh, reminds me to work on that table.

    Norton 4000 = F800 or JIS(new) 2000
    Norton 8000 = F1200 or JIS(new) 4000
    So that's Norton, how about Shapton, made in Japan? Do they use a different (i.e. Japanese) scale?

    The reason I am asking is that most of us will do a grit progression when setting a bevel and progress to polishing an edge. We simply look at numbers and automatically presume that a higher number means a finer hone which would be OK if all manufacturers of synthetic hones use the same grit scale.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Lesslemming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    554
    Thanked: 197

    Default

    Shapton uses another kind of grit measuring type,
    called the "Mesh-Size".
    The Mesh Size is referred to on the back of the Glasstones,
    right next to the actual grit size in micron,
    unfortunately without any tolerances.

    The Mesh-System is actually referring to a Wire-Mesh,
    and theoretically the number indicates the density of a wiremesh that was used
    to sort the grits out, in respect to the actual wire diameter

    I guess things got a little out of hand
    because wiremeshes could be used for sorting standart sandpaper grit sizes
    but were nowadays commonly used for diamond pastes
    wich came to be widely availiable.
    But who could possibly think about a wire mesh designed to sieve out 0.5µm particles

    The Mesh grit system is somewhat more reliable when it comes to higher grit sizes,
    because Jis System stops at 8.000, everything beyond it is not covered by the system
    (wich doesn´t mean it don´t exist)
    The thing is, there seem to be many interpretations of the mesh system as well *sigh*
    Maybe they all refer to different wire diameters (d'uh)

    0.5µm is ofte times referred to as 50.000 Mesh,
    sometimes it´s 60.000
    and Shapton says it´s 30.000 ....
    btw. Shapton 16k would translate into JIS 14k, I guess

    I think we will have to get used to the fact that we will never be sure
    if one hone is actually finer grained than the other.
    But that is not a big deal, because even though we would now it
    it wouldn´t asure a better finish, keener edge, smoother shave

    So what I do is, I rely on the numbers as little as possible.
    I know that my Shapton 5.000 comes before my Naniwa 8.000
    for example.
    But I am open minded when it comes to
    Shapton 5k or BBW first?
    Naniwa 10k or Shapton 16k first, or maybe after the Chinese 12k?
    So when it comes to finishing I refer to feeling more than numbers.
    If a Naniwa 10k gives me a better shave on a certain razor
    than the Shapton 16k did, I am perfectly fine with that,
    even though numbers would indicate different.
    It´s a lot trial and error

    But you should not let yourself get confused.
    A finisher is a finisher. Even though in my example above the Naniwa 10k
    provided me a better shave than the Shapton 16k,
    that doesn´t mean you have to go and buy both!

    You cannot rely on the numbers given by the factory
    if you want to compare hones with other brands.
    But you can certainly rely on them as "relative progression scales".
    So you will most of the time definitely know a Naniwa SS 8k comes after a SS 5k,
    but maybe not before a King 8k, for example.
    Last edited by Lesslemming; 07-15-2009 at 06:35 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •