Thread: The Perpetual Experiment

I know I am not welcomed to reply this thread but I will go head and let say what I think.
As most of you know experiment isn’t easy to do. The reasons are bias etc. The best experiment should be done by double blind studies and come on Someone should know what is going on right?
Now in this Experiment if person wants to rich result without bias’s then all 3 razor’s sharpened with first person shouldn’t be honed again. Except stropping. In this case experiment (which is 3 hones) and subjects -people who uses the straight’s can tell their opinion about the razor’s. which one shaves better or worse ,smooth, sharpest etc.

Experiment should done this way.
Someone hones and sends the razor 2 person put’s number ‘s on the blade. 1,2,3 .
1 sharpened by Norton
2 sharpened by coticule
3 shapened by nakayama these are examples.
Now 2 nd person gets all above information. 2 nd person doesn’t shave with any of them (to avoid bias) and sends razor’s to next person who is in the line (THIS PERSON SHAVES). And so on.
Tricks are in here every shaver lets know their opinions to the 2 person. After all this second person gives all information to the first Person.
When 1 st person( in early process) sends information about the blades to 2 nd person he lies. Not says truth. This is important and will make study double blind. In this case second person has no idea which hone used on which blade. again to avoid bias
At the end 1 st person gets results and says what happens how many people used and which blade they liked.
This will help how to figure it out competition among hones.
The only reason I put this information to help. If you don’t like just let me know or any MOD’s could delete it entirely.GL