Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aroliver59 View Post
    I believe the beehive logo is from Daniel Peres.
    Edit:After checking the wiki,The logo I'm thinking of looks more like a barrel with spigot than a beehive.
    Thank you but that is not it. I will take a "standard" picture of the razor eventually.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    174
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Great thread.

    What lens are you using?

    I took this with an inverted 18-55 set to 18mm.

    This blade is freshly honed on norton 4/8k then stropped on paste. Given that I hone straight up and down with no X and strop on a 2" paddle with an X, do others think the faint scratches at an angle are caused the the particles in the paste?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to rupert87 For This Useful Post:

    sparq (11-26-2009)

  4. #13
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rupert87 View Post
    Great thread.

    What lens are you using?

    I took this with an inverted 18-55 set to 18mm.

    This blade is freshly honed on norton 4/8k then stropped on paste. Given that I hone straight up and down with no X and strop on a 2" paddle with an X, do others think the faint scratches at an angle are caused the the particles in the paste?
    Hello Rupert,

    Excellent picture! Yes, if the blade had been cleaned so no paste residue was there when the picture was taken, the most rational explanation for that secondary pattern is scratches from the pasta. I am taking my pictures with an old 2.8/29 lens for Exakta SLRs.

    To BeBerlin: Robin, does it make sense to split the current DSLR topic in wiki so we have one dedicated to a gallery, instead of having all the pictures in the how-to topic?

  5. #14
    Retired Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    3,490
    Thanked: 1903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    To BeBerlin: Robin, does it make sense to split the current DSLR topic in wiki so we have one dedicated to a gallery, instead of having all the pictures in the how-to topic?
    I think it does. Stay tuned...

  6. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    174
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparq View Post
    Hello Rupert,

    Excellent picture! Yes, if the blade had been cleaned so no paste residue was there when the picture was taken, the most rational explanation for that secondary pattern is scratches from the pasta. I am taking my pictures with an old 2.8/29 lens for Exakta SLRs.

    To BeBerlin: Robin, does it make sense to split the current DSLR topic in wiki so we have one dedicated to a gallery, instead of having all the pictures in the how-to topic?
    Is honing on pasta the new wonder method?

  7. #16
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rupert87 View Post
    Is honing on pasta the new wonder method?
    Oh yes, but only that kind with whisky.

    I am flipping between the Czech and English speaking forums too often these days.

  8. #17
    Opto Ergo Sum bassguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,147
    Thanked: 998

    Default

    Get that man more stones!!

  9. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,211
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    I already did. have not you seen them?

  10. #19
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Gentlemen,

    I apologize for stating the obvious. The point of this post and the Wiki topic was not a comparison of hones, but showing you how one can take high magnification pictures of razors; and for peanuts only if you already own a DSLR camera. The pictures were meant as an inspiration for your own work. I apologize but I have to reject your kind offers of lending me your hones as the lack of free time is my limit.

    I do not use pictures like these as a test of my honing progress as I can usually tell what is wrong with an edge with a naked eye and you should be able to do so, too (or with glasses if you need them). I found those pictures useful for demystification of edges, after all the razor honing is a simple process and as such it should not be wrapped in mystery.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •