Thread: HONING ART?

I am sorry If I used the incorrect words as in ruined about the razor. I was meaning to address the issue of the razor being consider unstable (The steel of the razor) by your post on Coticule. Be.

The reason I was finding it something to mention on both sites was due to the conflict of opinion that the razor was considered "Skillfully honed" but considered badly honed on a different website. I found it some what confusing and could confuse someone that is new to honing also.

Originally Posted by Disburden

I am sorry If I used the incorrect words as in ruined about the razor. I was meaning to address the issue of the razor being consider unstable (The steel of the razor) by your post on Coticule.be.

No problem, Nick. I just wanted to point out that my opinion was more nuanced than your choice of words suggested.

Originally Posted by Disburden

The reason I was finding it something to mention on both sites was due to the conflict of opinion (...) I found it some what confusing and could confuse someone that is new to honing also.

I agree with that. On Coticule.be, I tried to elaborate on my objections as detailed as possible. These are all honest concerns, based on what I believe to know about honing. People can and should always make up there own minds.
I have no problem with that. If you guys believe the honing history of that razor suggests "state of the art", that's fine with me.

Kind regards,
Bart.

I am going to lock this thread as once again it is not worth the argument.

Thanks.

Lynn.